Said in CommitteeBeta

Exactly as spoken.

Representative John T. Vines

Speaker names can be wrong. Names are identified automatically through voice matching and may contain errors. Always verify speaker attribution against the video before citing it.

Committees

No committee participation found.

Recent Meetings

Date Committee Speaking Time
March 19, 2013 — 60s
March 15, 2013 — 49s
March 14, 2013 — 144s
March 13, 2013 — 155s
March 12, 2013 — 156s
March 12, 2013 — 35s
March 8, 2013 — 85s
March 7, 2013 — 12s
March 5, 2013 — 277s
Feb. 28, 2013 — 127s
Feb. 28, 2013 — 750s
Feb. 26, 2013 — 218s
Feb. 25, 2013 — 106s
Feb. 22, 2013 — 110s
Feb. 21, 2013 — 135s
Feb. 20, 2013 — 73s
Feb. 19, 2013 — 98s
Feb. 19, 2013 — 80s
Feb. 14, 2013 — 288s
Feb. 12, 2013 — 42s
Feb. 7, 2013 — 100s
Feb. 5, 2013 — 66s
Jan. 31, 2013 — 41s
Jan. 31, 2013 — 226s
Jan. 28, 2013 — 109s
Jan. 23, 2013 — 24s
Jan. 22, 2013 — 230s
Jan. 17, 2013 — 12s
March 31, 2011 — 192s
March 31, 2011 — 387s
March 30, 2011 — 2353s
March 30, 2011 — 12s
March 30, 2011 — 26s
March 29, 2011 — 36s
March 29, 2011 — 193s
March 28, 2011 — 236s
March 25, 2011 — 79s
March 25, 2011 — 44s
March 23, 2011 — 270s
March 22, 2011 — 15s
March 21, 2011 — 30s
March 17, 2011 — 46s
March 17, 2011 — 3s
March 17, 2011 — 72s
March 15, 2011 — 24s
March 11, 2011 — 75s
March 10, 2011 — 40s
March 9, 2011 — 64s
March 8, 2011 — 488s
March 7, 2011 — 41s

Recent Transcript Excerpts

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (1:05:56)

And essentially what this bill does is it adds and allows, codifies what the courts are already doing in situations of abuse and neglect, shifting the focus and looking at the non-custodial parent. Since in recent years they've been looking at that as opposed to going directly to foster care. And a lot of times, even though the other parent is a non-custodial, they still are fit to step in in these situations. So we're simply addressing that law. I'd be happy to address any questions other than that.

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (1:05:28)

Representative Vines, you're recognized to explain the bill. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Friends, today I bring you Senate Bill 433, This is a bill from the Senate, Representative Thompson, Senator Thompson, Representative Feit, and I bring this to clarify a couple of provisions in the Judicial Council's juvenile bill, and it clarifies a couple of provisions of the Judicial Code dealing with review hearings and permanency planning hearings.

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (31:35)

So what this bill does is amends it to allow up to three cards for each child, and each one is paid for $5 apiece, so there may be a little bit additional in revenue, but there's no expense to the state. Other than that, we just did this so we don't have to keep coming back and amending it. Otherwise, I'd appreciate a good vote. I'll take any questions, but would appreciate a

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (31:07)

bill. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Friends, I bring you House Bill 1584. If you will recall, those of us that were here last session, we amended this bill to expand the parameters to allow more children and also grandparents to get these ID cards for our minor children. What we found out in the last two years was sometimes when there are split households, a divorce, that each parent needs a card, and we only had provisions in there to get one card.

Meeting — Feb. 7, 2013 (14:09)

that will sway your vote. No, it does not. Thank you, Mr. Vance. I'd appreciate a positive vote. Representative

Meeting — Feb. 7, 2013 (13:51)

put this language back in, and, you know, leave well enough alone. And I'd be glad to take questions, I think. Representative Leonard, you're recognized for a question. Chairman, thank you,

Meeting — Feb. 7, 2013 (13:19)

and stand a changed man and ask for your consent to put the language back in that this is language we took out of the bill two years ago. It apparently created 84 other problems than the one that actually fixed. So my agreement with these folks through some of Representative Overby's constituents and Representative Lampkin and Representative Link's constituents was, let's go unring that bell if we can. So if you will, I'd be honored if you'd help me fix this wrong, correct this bill,

Meeting — Feb. 7, 2013 (12:45)

and learned a valuable lesson that don't stand in that hallway a couple of days before bill filing deadline or you get to run stuff that you might not should. Long story short, this bill took some language out that we thought was helping when it came to boat manufacturers and demo tags and those of you that served with us in the 88th remember the impassioned plea that I gave you to pass this bill two years ago, well, I come back with egg on my face

Meeting — Feb. 7, 2013 (12:27)

your bill. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I bring to you today House Bill 1195, and let me begin by saying this is the quintessential bill that didn't do anything that, uh-oh, it did. I ran this bill last session at the bequest of some people.

Meeting — Feb. 5, 2013 (40:58)

Hearing none, all those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed? Same sign. Congratulations, Representative Wright. You've passed

Meeting — Feb. 5, 2013 (40:28)

Okay, I didn't see any. Any questions from the committee? Mr. Gillum, you got a motion at the proper time, Mr. Chairman. All right. Close for my bill. You're close for your bill, Mr. Wright. We have a motion. We'll recognize Mr. Gillum for that motion. Mr. Chairman, I move. Do pass as amended. Hearing the motion. The motion is to pass House Bill 1021 as amended. Any further discussion?

Meeting — Feb. 5, 2013 (40:18)

committee, and then I don't see, we would open it up to the public, but I do not see anyone. Is there anyone here that would like to speak for or against this bill?

Meeting — Feb. 5, 2013 (38:11)

Any opposed? Your amendment is approved. Proceed with your bill, Representative Wright. Thank you,

Meeting — Feb. 5, 2013 (38:00)

I appreciate a good vote. Do you make a motion to approve the amendment? Any discussion? All those in favor, signify by saying aye.

Meeting — Jan. 31, 2013 (58:46)

Representative Catlett, do you have anyone else wishing to speak on this? Then you will take questions, and your witnesses also, if they could stay put. I think there may be

Meeting — Jan. 31, 2013 (52:43)

date. Do we need a vote on that? I think we do. All right. Hearing no objection, House Bill 1042 will be moved to our deferred list. next item on the agenda is Representative Catlett are you prepared to present your bill please move then

Meeting — Jan. 31, 2013 (52:02)

All those in favor, signify by saying aye.

Meeting — Jan. 31, 2013 (52:21)

All right. Next item. Representative Bell, do you want to take care of an item, I believe, on the agenda? Yes,

Meeting — Jan. 31, 2013 (51:55)

amended. Is there any discussion in the motion? Hearing none, the motion before the committee is do pass as amended.

Meeting — Jan. 31, 2013 (51:40)

appreciate a good vote. Thank you, Senator King. Representative Gillen? Thank

Bills Discussed

No bills found.

← Back to all legislators