Said in CommitteeBeta

Exactly as spoken.

Representative John K. Hutchison

Speaker names can be wrong. Names are identified automatically through voice matching and may contain errors. Always verify speaker attribution against the video before citing it.

Committees

No committee participation found.

Recent Meetings

Date Committee Speaking Time
March 19, 2013 — 21s
March 15, 2013 — 131s
March 15, 2013 — 15s
March 14, 2013 — 32s
March 14, 2013 — 51s
March 13, 2013 — 200s
March 13, 2013 — 10s
March 7, 2013 — 5s
March 6, 2013 — 7s
March 1, 2013 — 126s
Feb. 27, 2013 — 79s
Feb. 22, 2013 — 96s
Feb. 22, 2013 — 37s
Feb. 20, 2013 — 86s
Feb. 15, 2013 — 61s
Feb. 14, 2013 — 46s
Feb. 13, 2013 — 115s
Feb. 13, 2013 — 128s
Feb. 12, 2013 — 24s
Feb. 8, 2013 — 33s
Feb. 8, 2013 — 32s
Feb. 6, 2013 — 8s
Feb. 1, 2013 — 434s
Jan. 30, 2013 — 16s
Jan. 22, 2013 — 41s
Jan. 17, 2013 — 120s

Recent Transcript Excerpts

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (58:45)

couldn't agree with you more, Representative Lenderman. But do you think it would be a safe question to say that maybe those numbers in 2003 could be looked at more in one way? You know what I mean? Okay. I'm all about you here. I'm all about you. Thanks, Shane. All

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (42:24)

you have a question yes ma'am thank you madam chair I guess this is a proper question is this been the whole problem with all this to start with this fence is that a a proper question would

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (3:57)

before granting the power of eminent domain. I thank you. Any questions to the

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (3:26)

that this project that will not deliver any electricity to Arkansas customers may obtain the power of eminent domain from federal agency when it failed to meet the requirements to qualify for public utility status under state law. We should express our concern to the United States Department of Energy and to our United States congressional delegation. We should encourage the United States Department of Energy to carefully consider the effects of this project on Arkansas

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (2:54)

Therefore, clean line does not qualify to have the power of eminent domain in Arkansas. Third, clean line is attempting to obtain authority from the United States Department of Energy. that will provide it with the power of eminent domain. It is now using federal process to obtain the power of eminent domain for which it did not qualify under state law. We as members of the Arkansas General Assembly should be concerned

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (2:14)

Arkansas, and I encourage each member of the Arkansas General Assembly to share my concern for the following reasons. First, the clean line project will affect numerous property owners across Arkansas, but will not serve any customers in Arkansas. The transmission line is not planned to deliver any electricity to customers in Arkansas. The line will move power from Oklahoma to customers in Tennessee and other states to our east. Second, the Arkansas Public Service Commission determined that the clean line did not meet the legal requirements to be public utility in Arkansas.

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (1:57)

All right. Thank you, Mr. Chair and committee. I'd like to read one simple and short

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (1:51)

Mr. Chair and committee. Am I on? You need to speak into the mic, yeah.

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (2:03)

thing here, if that's okay. I am concerned about the potential impact of the clean line project on the state of

Meeting — Feb. 8, 2013 (2:00)

visual, performing, or literary Secondly, it clarifies that the governor may consult with educational institutions public and private, state agencies, and members of the public for selection

Meeting — Feb. 8, 2013 (1:29)

vote. You may proceed. Thank you. Secondly, I'd like to ask to adopt the new amendment, please. Would you like me to explain that or what? Well, let's go ahead

Meeting — Feb. 8, 2013 (0:37)

the motion to expunge the vote on the amendment of last Friday. Please. Okay. Representative Dickinson. I have a motion

Meeting — Feb. 8, 2013 (36:42)

I'm sorry sir I guess I guess I'm making a comment I'm not sure if I agree or disagree at at this point representation well I

Meeting — Feb. 8, 2013 (36:09)

question thank you mr. chair I just want to say first of all representative I support you a hundred and twenty percent on this I just learned by experience the past week though even it's even if it's a good things sometimes there might be some things to make

Meeting — Feb. 6, 2013 (9:46)

stuff I encourage others to do the same so noted does anyone

Meeting — Feb. 6, 2013 (9:41)

it on record that I sure like the way they think I like that I like the cleanup

Meeting — Feb. 1, 2013 (42:06)

and run the bill Thank you very

Meeting — Feb. 1, 2013 (41:24)

okay, the amendment says yeah, go ahead Representative Hutchinson the amendment says that the artist laureate shall serve a term of 10 years or until a successor has been appointed for this honorary designation. Thank you very much. I'm sorry.

Meeting — Feb. 1, 2013 (41:12)

something thank you Representative Payton, it's in the amendment have you read the amendment? no sir would y'all want me to read that or what?

Meeting — Feb. 1, 2013 (39:29)

a very good idea myself sir

Bills Discussed

No bills found.

← Back to all legislators