Representative Fredrick J. Love

ALC-Lottery Oversight Subcommittee — Dec. 16, 2019 (27:30)

to? Sure can. Absolutely. Representative Love. Thank you, Madam Chair. Mr. Woosley, I'm looking over this. Do we do anything for

Arkansas Legislative Council (ALC) — Dec. 20, 2019 (1:00:57)

because because we're talking about housing inmates period it doesn't matter if it's in a county jail or in this new regional jail are there any reasons why you ask for these additional

Arkansas Legislative Council (ALC) — Dec. 20, 2019 (1:00:53)

any particular reason why you asked for additional standards?

Arkansas Legislative Council (ALC) — Dec. 20, 2019 (59:56)

that you are holding the private to, you're not holding the counties to? and they're i mean because we're both talking we're talking about housing prisoners period

Arkansas Legislative Council (ALC) — Dec. 20, 2019 (59:47)

increase that the people approved during the last election. Are you saying currently that you are not the standards

Arkansas Legislative Council (ALC) — Dec. 20, 2019 (58:34)

to guarantee $40 for these counties. Is there any particular reason why we're guaranteeing $40 for these counties and

Arkansas Legislative Council (ALC) — Dec. 20, 2019 (58:16)

Okay, so in their counties. What is our current guaranteed rate for counties to hold state prisoners? The current rate for offenders being

Arkansas Legislative Council (ALC) — Dec. 20, 2019 (58:01)

Senator. Representative Love, do you have a question? Of course. So we're going to pay $40. We're going to guarantee $40 per prisoner. Is that what you're saying? That's the testimony, correct? That would

Arkansas Legislative Council (ALC) — Dec. 20, 2019 (46:44)

these expenditures along the way because I noticed that you said that you didn't report them to this committee until now so I'm just trying to figure that

Arkansas Legislative Council (ALC) — Dec. 20, 2019 (46:35)

to get some clarification in regards to the money being put in now did you all track

Arkansas Legislative Council (ALC) — Dec. 20, 2019 (33:43)

Love. I don't have a recusal because I'm not a big shot. Okay. Well, if you. But I do have a question on the corrections department, number one. So I'll get back in

Arkansas Legislative Council (ALC) — Dec. 20, 2019 (7:14)

do you i just had a quick question yes they're not going to be a

City, County & Local Affairs Committee (Senate & House) — Jan. 13, 2020 (1:23:27)

I do believe that in time, maybe not quick enough to catch this circumstance today, But in time, the legislation that passed would have provided us the tools. We would have placed Perrin Owensville under what we

City, County & Local Affairs Committee (Senate & House) — Jan. 13, 2020 (1:23:52)

guess I can't really speak for the Municipal League

City, County & Local Affairs Committee (Senate & House) — Jan. 13, 2020 (1:23:17)

all circumstances, but a lot of times you get the economy of scale. You get a larger system can come in and provide a more sustainable water source for our citizens.

City, County & Local Affairs Committee (Senate & House) — Jan. 13, 2020 (1:16:59)

And so any knowledge I have would be from my time at Environmental

City, County & Local Affairs Committee (Senate & House) — Jan. 13, 2020 (1:16:52)

will say, and I give a disclaimer, I was at the Department of Environmental Quality when that consent decree was negotiated.

City, County & Local Affairs Committee (Senate & House) — Jan. 13, 2020 (1:15:50)

And they'd have to submit that to ANRC for review. There was a rotating basis, not every year, but every few years. So ANRC would look to make sure. We actually have probably more systems that we believe are undercharging what the true costs are, meaning they have this giant balloon payment, you could say, to come in the future. more than one's

City, County & Local Affairs Committee (Senate & House) — Jan. 13, 2020 (1:16:11)

overcharging but that system would we do believe and why we support it would help to solve

City, County & Local Affairs Committee (Senate & House) — Jan. 13, 2020 (1:15:39)

be audited? So, you know, one option would be what the task force recommended, And that was, in a staggered approach, all systems would have to do a rate study. And they would have to account for all the different costs of setting rates.