Aging, Children and Youth, & Legislative Affairs- House
Video
Transcript
1 document
Bills discussed (4)
| Bill | Title | Sponsor | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HB1669
Act 509
· 10 mentions in agenda, chapter, transcript
Matched: “…Revised 4/3/25 @ 4:25 PM) Moved SB340 to Deferred Bills and HB1669 to Concur in Senate Amendment House Committee on Aging, Chi…”
|
TO CREATE THE KEEP KIDS FIRST ACT; AND TO PROVIDE FOR PROTECTIONS FROM DISCRIMINATION FOR … | Bentley | Notification that HB1669 is now Act 509 |
|
HB1964
Act 825
· 4 mentions in agenda, chapter, transcript
Matched: “…D RELIGIOUS BELIEFS. REGULAR AGENDA Number Sponsor Subtitle HB1964 Brooks TO MOVE THE CHILD WELFARE OMBUDSMAN DIVISION AND THE…”
|
TO MOVE THE CHILD WELFARE OMBUDSMAN DIVISION AND THE JUVENILE OMBUDSMAN DIVISION TO THE DEPARTMENT … | Brooks | Notification that HB1964 is now Act 825 |
|
HCR1010
· 2 mentions in chapter, agenda
Matched: “HCR1010 T. Shephard REQUESTING A STUDY OF WAYS TO IMPROVE THE STATE…”
|
REQUESTING A STUDY OF WAYS TO IMPROVE THE STATE'S JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR YOUTH. | T. Shephard | Approved by the Governor |
|
SB340
· 1 mention in agenda
Matched: “AGENDA (Revised 4/3/25 @ 4:25 PM) Moved SB340 to Deferred Bills and HB1669 to Concur in Senate Amendment…”
|
TO AMEND ARKANSAS LAW CONCERNING CERTAIN FEES, EXPENSES, AND COSTS IMPOSED ON A JUVENILE OR … | A. Clark | Died in House Committee at Sine Die adjournment. |
Machine transcript
May contain errors. Verify important quotations against the official video.
About transcript accuracy
- Source
- Whisper
- Model
- ggml-large-v3-turbo.bin
- Processing date
- October 7, 2026
Chair
Unverified
0:00
Chair sees a quorum and is thankful for the quorum this morning on our not regular day. And something else to shock you all, we are going to go in order today. I know, hold on to your hat. So that means we'll begin with House Bill 1669. There is an amendment we need to concur in.
thank you thank you if you'll introduce yourself vice chair then you are recognized
Representative Mary Bentley
Unverified
0:53
to present your amendment thank you chairman state representative mary bentley district 54 happy to see you all this morning. If you guys remember, House Bill 1669 was simply
putting into statute what our current policy is, the religious freedom for our adoption agencies and our foster parents. So this amendment was brought to me by the AG's office when we get to the Senate side. They want to make sure that we were not getting rid of our state's sovereign immunity. So just a couple changes that they requested from me from the AG's office, and that's what we have in
Chair
Unverified
1:23
this bill this morning. Are there questions on the amendment? Representative
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
1:28
Springer, you're recognized. Good morning, and thank you, Madam Chair. So I'm looking, I have the bill pulled up, and I'm looking at page 6,
and the wording that I have is not what's here. Line 20 reads this number 2. Can I just interrupt real quick, Representative Springer?
Representative Mary Bentley
Unverified
1:43
The bill that you're pulling up already, the amendment's already engrossed, so it's going to be hard to take what you see on paper here and try to match it up with that bill because it's already been engrossed on the Senate side. Is that making sense to you? Well, yeah. And
Speaker 17
2:00
if it's a lawyer question, I'm not going to be
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
2:02
able to answer it for you. Well, it's not reading the way that's here is basically what I'm saying.
So I'm not sure that I understand what the amendment is going to be. Well,
Chair
Unverified
2:12
it may have, the amendment's already in that bill you're reading. So it may have changed a page number once they added a line or took a line. Does that make sense? That makes sense. Yes,
Representative Glenn Barnes
Unverified
2:23
thank you for clarifying that for me, Chairman. You keep
Chair
Unverified
2:30
looking, and we'll see if anybody else. Are there other questions on the amendment?
Speaker 24
2:38
So does that make sense? Does that look right to
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
2:59
you, Representative Springer? I'm reading it now. Okay. Let me just read what it says. It says, sovereign governmental and qualified immunities to suit and from liability are waived and abolished to the extent of liability created by the subsection D of this action.
So I thought her proposal was that it wouldn't be waived. So this is still saying it's going to be waived. I guess I'm not understanding. Do you
Chair
Unverified
3:24
see where she's reading, Representative Bentley? I
Representative Mary Bentley
Unverified
3:26
don't have any idea where she's reading. I didn't hear her page or
Representative Dolly Henley
Unverified
3:32
line number. Sorry. So do you have a question that you
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
3:38
can directly ask her that will help her? Page 6, line 20. And it changed to 24.
It talks about sovereign immunity. Sovereign governmental and qualified immunity to suit and from liability are waived and abolished to the extent of liability created by the subsection D of this section. And I thought your testimony was that you're not waiving, and this says that it is being waived. I guess clarify that and help me out. The question is, is it or is it not being waived? It is to the extent, I
Representative Mary Bentley
Unverified
4:14
think if you continue reading the whole entire section there,
keep reading on there. You have to read the whole entire section there of Section D. So, again, I'm not a lawyer. I was asked to present
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
4:27
this. I'm not either, but I'm just reading what you said. I'm just going to know
Representative Mary Bentley
Unverified
4:32
what the AG's office asked me to run this amendment for them to make sure that we're not abolishing totally our state sovereigns' immunity. So that's what we're doing. And it's already codified in this bill.
Representative Glenn Barnes
Unverified
4:47
Any other questions? Okay would you like to close for your amendment? I'm closed I make a motion do pass.
Representative Dolly Henley
Unverified
5:00
Okay well okay is there anyone here to speak for or against this amendment? Okay so we have a motion to concur in Senate Amendment 1 to House Bill 1669. All in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed no. No. The
Representative Glenn Barnes
Unverified
5:14
ayes have it. You've passed your amendment. Thank you chairman. Again
Representative Mary Bentley
Unverified
5:19
Committee, this is House Bill 1669, is putting into statute what we have in current policy on our state level to make sure that our adoption agencies that are doing a great job in this state and our foster parents will continue to be able to exercise their religious freedoms and not be discriminated against, as they are being in other states. is why I'm wanting to put it in statute. In other states, they are discriminating against Christian believers for not allowing them to be foster parents and stopping Catholic agencies from being adoption agencies. So we want to make sure in Arkansas that's not going to happen. That's
Representative Glenn Barnes
Unverified
5:47
the whole purpose of this bill. Are there questions by committee? Representative Springer, your mic's
Chair
Unverified
5:58
still on. Do you have another question? Okay, just checking. Representative Barnes, you recognize? How
does DHS feel about this amendment? They have not opposed
Representative Glenn Barnes
Unverified
6:10
the bill yet. No, they've not opposed the bill. So it's been passed over in the Senate completely. We've already passed it here in the House. Thank you. Any
Representative Dolly Henley
Unverified
6:23
other questions by committee? I don't see anyone signed up to speak for or against the bill.
Chair
Unverified
6:29
No, they've already passed it. What? They've already concurred. well now
she's presenting the bill she doesn't have to oh you
Representative Dolly Henley
Unverified
6:42
don't have to present the bill surprise wonderful we've already done that thank you yes so we just had a few extra questions just spend a little
Chair
Unverified
6:50
time on it so thank you your bill is passed thank you and committee we're going to move down to house bill 1964 by representative brooks if you will introduce yourself
Representative Brooks, then you are recognized.
Representative Keith Brooks
Unverified
7:07
Thank you, Madam Chair. Thank you, Committee
Keith Brooks, District 78. This morning I bring to you really nothing more than a technical correction. The title, frankly, of 1964 basically says everything that it does. So it's moving child welfare ombudsman from the Arkansas Child Abuse Radio-Static Violence Commission and juvenile ombudsman division to the office of the inspector general and to rename it as division
of ombudsman so basically the uams is supportive of this office of inspector general support of this basically what we're trying to do is is just as you co-locate these two functions it's going to create independent oversight over dcfs dys build different positions to cross train and work together and just create more efficiencies in the system. And I'd be happy to answer questions. I believe that Director Wright is also happy to answer questions, should we need. Representative Springer, you're recognized. Well,
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
8:03
may Director Wright come to the table and explain what's actually taking place
because I've had some concerns about this. Director Wright,
Chair
Unverified
8:13
if you will introduce yourself, you are recognized. Hi, good morning.
Speaker 51
8:20
I'm Tiffany Wright, and I'm the director for the Division of Children and Family Services. And so basically, why
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
8:28
the need for this? Why is there a need for this to take place at this particular
Speaker 53
8:34
time? In my opinion, I do believe it is time for this to happen.
Speaker 55
8:38
This will put the two ombudsman together under one organization, which will increase efficiency in operating, as well as ensure that we get systems recommendations for children and families that we're serving and how we can all together as a state continue to improve outcomes for the kids and families that we're serving. Follow up. Isn't it
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
9:03
true that this takes away some of the parent and other person's participation in the process, and then it goes directly from this one individual to the governor's office for approval?
It takes away a lot of the input from other parties involved. Is that true
Speaker 55
9:25
or not? That's what I've been told. I don't believe that that's true. The functions would remain the same. a family member, a parent, a relative could still call and voice a concern around something that is happening related to either ombudsman office, and that they would then function over and operate the same as inquiring about what's going on and what systems issues may be happening.
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
9:53
Since I'm the only one, thank you, Madam
Representative Jason Nazarenko
Unverified
9:57
Chair. Madam Chair, should there be additional questions, Secretary Putnam is on
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
10:03
her way here. as well. So I guess I'm trying to understand. So
the previous, tell us what the previous process was
Speaker 55
10:16
you're proposing. The current ombudsman sits underneath the commission. We're proposing that that ombudsman move underneath the Department of Inspector General and that everything else essentially remains the same. So right now
they can call and voice concerns, complaints, and they reach out to DCFS and we follow up with those. It would be the same if it's moved or relocated. And why did you all select the Inspector General? I'm going
Speaker 57
10:43
to ask for an assist from Secretary Putnam. Madam Chair, can I bring Secretary Putnam to
Chair
Unverified
10:54
the table? Yes. If you will introduce yourself, then you'll be recognized. Secretary Putnam. Good
Speaker 64
11:09
morning. Christy Putnam, Secretary of Arkansas DHS.
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
11:12
We chose the Inspector General because they have an audit function. Their normal course of business is to do internal investigations and also to be a third-party objective representation in that process. They already have a relationship with our Medicaid team. They have the Medicaid fraud unit, Medicaid Inspector General, and we believe that putting all of the same functions where we want an external party to look into concerns that are raised by constituents, stakeholders, and staff
would be the most appropriate place
Chair
Unverified
11:50
to put that. Are there other questions by
Representative Justin Gonzales
Unverified
11:54
committee? Representative Gonzalez-Wardin, you recognize? Yes. Thank you, Chair. I was just wondering about, I know that you're, for efficiency purposes, you're trying to merge these. So how do the experiences and educational background mirror the ombudsman that's no longer going to be there?
So, as far as the educational experience, because I'm just noticing in, well, on page, on page five, there are educational requirements and experiences since, and that was under the ombudsman. So, I just wondered if, and then also the experiences, the minimum qualifications for an ombudsman, that's also found on page two.
And so it's not reflected, I'm not seeing the educational background mirroring along the way. So I just wanted to know about what the educational experiences background would be for this person.
Speaker 55
12:59
It's my understanding that it would remain the same, the same experience and requirements that are currently there. But I think also that we would, the Department of Inspector General, sorry, can't get that out, would also have oversight over the experiences based on position grade.
So the hiring of the position would be based on the grade that is being hired for, if that makes sense. There's not
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
13:25
an intent to change the education requirements, so I'll be happy to take a look at that and make sure that it still transfers over to Department of
Representative Justin Gonzales
Unverified
13:36
Inspector General. Yes, that's one of my concerns. It would be great if something to that effect could remain in here and not be deleted. just so that we know that experience and education is moving along.
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
13:48
Yes, the intent is to pick up the education requirements and the requirements for the position and the function of the positions and simply move it over to Department of Inspector General that has as its book of work internal audit functions and oversight of other agency functions. We felt like that was aligned with the same kind of work that the Department of Inspector General currently performs. Are there any other questions by committee? Okay,
Representative Dolly Henley
Unverified
14:12
we do have one signed up to speak on the bill.
Chair
Unverified
14:19
Greg Parrish. If you'll introduce yourself, you're recognized.
Speaker 76
14:29
Greg Parrish, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, and Madam Chair, with the permission of the chair, I have to my right Brooke Digby, who is the juvenile ombudsman. if it's all right that i have her up here with me if you will just introduce yourself
Speaker 78
14:44
as well please my name is brooke digby and i'm the juvenile ombudsman for the state thank you madam chair
Speaker 76
14:53
and members the the members may not know but i signed up on this bill and i didn't put for or against uh but i know that the juvenile ombudsman who is under the public defender commission needed to be heard on this and she is under my supervision and so I like to show up when I have an employee that's testifying so if there's questions for me but just for a background I just want to give you a little background the juvenile ombudsman and the child welfare ombudsman
are two different entities the juvenile ombudsman falls under the branch of the Arkansas Public Defender Commission agency. It is funded to us through the Department of Human Services. So it gets a little bit convoluted. Our funding for this position comes from the department. And so while we supervise Ms. Digby and cover her expenses out of our budget,
there is no budget for her expenses. That's what the commission does. And that's how she reports to us. And her necessity to the defense bar, especially public defenders, is being able to testify in hearings where there may be a motion to transfer to juvenile court, where we're looking for what is available as far as rehabilitation for a juvenile to keep that juvenile in juvenile court or to move that juvenile to juvenile court as opposed to an adult court.
where the main goal in juvenile proceedings is rehabilitation. While that is part of the goal in adult court, it also includes retribution and punishment as well. Now, you will also see in this bill a reference to parent counsel. And I don't mean to insult anybody if they already know this, but the parent counsel falls under the umbrella of the Public Defender Commission,
but as the director I have no involvement over their day-to-day activities I do not supervise them they have their own director they just fall up under our umbrella so I think that I just point that out because I know that's in the bill if anybody had a question I don't think it's pertinent to what we're doing here today but I know it's referenced in the bill and so I wanted to be here I know Ms. Digby wanted to be here to answer any questions and I am open to any questions as I know she is
Speaker 83
17:28
as well and she may have something she would like to state to the committee if that's
Speaker 84
17:33
proper hi i just wanted to be here today because um i've been in
Speaker 79
17:43
this position almost seven years and um no one has even approached me about moving so i was a little blindsided to say the least um i've been serving under the public defender commission the entire time and work closely with all of the kids' public defenders. And so I wasn't exactly sure even what the purpose for the move was
and how I could better serve youth, which is ultimately what I want to do. So if moving will help that, great. But, again, no one has come to me and even asked if this could improve services. Thank you. Are there questions for these witnesses? Representative
Speaker 78
18:26
Gonzalez-Werthin, you're recognized. Yes. So may
Representative Justin Gonzales
Unverified
18:37
how would this, how do you think this might improve services or what do you see in the future with the merger?
Speaker 79
18:52
the limited information that I have, putting both ombudsman offices together definitely makes sense in my head. We sometimes work together. The Child Welfare Office has the ability to investigate maltreatment investigations, and I make a lot of hotline calls in my position so sometimes we will work together in that capacity or sometimes they
DYS might hold a child that is in DCFS custody and that is considered a dual custody youth so there may be times where I would have to reach out to the child welfare ombudsman about that particular youth and we work together to resolve any complaints or concerns but we are doing that right now in our independent offices so I hope that answers your question. Representative
Chair
Unverified
19:52
Childress you're recognized for a question
Representative Paul Childress
Unverified
19:54
Ms. Digby I've listened to your testimony so if this passes committee and it becomes law is your job is
Speaker 79
20:06
in jeopardy, correct? I don't know. Okay. Again, no one has approached me from DHS about this, so I was under the impression the positions were moving. We were moving to the inspector general if this passes,
but I was a little confused by the language on whether or not they were hiring someone new for the positions, so I'm not sure.
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
20:37
Okay, thank you. Representative Springer, you're recognized. Thank you, Madam Chair. Good question. So can someone, Secretary, come up and respond to that question for us? Sure.
It is not the intention of either Secretary Bragg or myself to have anyone lose positions.
The intent was simply to put these offices together to streamline and have them be able to work together, do some cross-training as well, because we do have children and youth who go from DCFS to DYS and between the systems. So we do have a lot of crossover in the functions. And as Ms. Digme noted, there also are some times when hotline calls need to be made, you know, on the DYS side, and they are made. And she has supported that function for a number of years. You know, as to the positions themselves, though, you know, there's no intent to terminate anyone.
There is the intent to retain the current individuals who are in those offices and move them
Speaker 52
21:37
over to Department of Inspector General. Follow-up. So is there going
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
21:42
to be a process of you all coming together and deciding how this office is going to operate? So will there need, and in addition, I guess my question is, Will you have to develop rules for that to take place? And then I guess my final question, and hopefully it'll be it, is there a time period for all of this to take place?
Speaker 52
22:04
Yes, ma'am. So I don't believe, and I'll defer
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
22:07
to Representative Brooks as the sponsor, I don't believe there's an emergency clause, so this bill would just take its natural course in passing and taking effect sometime in July or August. We would have enough time between then and now to have those discussions, have discussions with the Department of Inspector General about transitioning and when i say we i mean the collective we that would be with the current organizations so uams commission on child abuse rape and domestic violence and where the child welfare ombudsman currently is located and then the public defender commission where the dys
Speaker 64
22:39
ombudsman is currently located would have time to sit down and make the transition plans to make sure everyone is is moving over with all of the appropriate
Representative Dolly Henley
Unverified
22:55
supports committee if you're not using a mic could you make sure
Representative Jason Nazarenko
Unverified
22:58
you've turned it off there is an emergency clause but it states july 1 2025 is effective date so i mean in essence it's basically
Representative Keith Brooks
Unverified
23:04
the same as if it became law without an emergency clause from a time frame standpoint representative
Representative Jason Nazarenko
Unverified
23:12
nazarenko you're recognized thank you madam chair um was there a reason for like
not include in the discussion, like as the decision was made to kind of reconfigure? Was there a reason to not bring
Speaker 71
23:30
those folks in and kind of plan for it? There wasn't a
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
23:35
specific reason other than, you know, the department supports the functions of both and has, you know, had input from other parties about how this function could better serve our youth and families who are in DCFS and DYS custody and so the opportunity to
to sit down and do the transition planning we felt would be better served to do after we were able to move forward
Representative Jason Nazarenko
Unverified
23:59
with the plan to consolidate the offices. Follow up when did the discussion start
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
24:06
to to realign this if you will? We've had discussions about how we could coordinate the two functions probably for at least six months, maybe longer, just about how they could coordinate better.
Representative Jason Nazarenko
Unverified
24:18
And that was with the two agencies speaking together? With
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
24:21
agencies, you know, there have been some, I won't call them discussions about specifically
transitioning, but I mean, Mr. Parrish and I have even had some conversations about how the functions work, you know, how the oversight works, how these positions could coordinate and how the department could coordinate, you know, and have some better oversight from the ombudsman functions themselves. Because at the end of the day, we want the functions to be able to support system change. And I think that's one of the things
Speaker 98
24:51
that we've pointed out. Right. Thank you. And Representative, if I may respond, I would agree
Speaker 76
24:57
with the Secretary. We work on many other issues besides just this. And we've had meetings going since you
became since you came director uh about a multitude of issues and they just all overlap and so we were trying what we have discussed in the past is how can each position better support the other and somehow from all that maybe this arose or whatever i don't know but uh we've had discussions about a multitude of things okay thank you ma'am representative springer you're
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
25:29
recognized. I'm sorry. My question was answered. Are
Chair
Unverified
25:33
there other questions by committee for these
Representative Keith Brooks
Unverified
25:35
witnesses? And I do want to clarify a question by Representative Gonzalez-Worthin relative to the education requirements. We do need to transfer those over, and so those will be added as a Senate amendment. Thank you. Thank you.
Representative Dolly Henley
Unverified
25:44
Seeing no other questions, thank you for your testimony. Members, we have no one else signed up. Is there anyone in the audience that would like to speak on this bill? Okay, Representative Brooks, would you like
Chair
Unverified
25:56
to close for your bill? Thank you, Madam Chair and committee. I am
Representative Keith Brooks
Unverified
26:01
close for the bill and make a motion do pass. Members, we have a motion
Representative Dolly Henley
Unverified
26:06
do pass. Is there any discussion on the motion? Representative Gonzalez-Worthin? No. Okay, thank you. Okay, then all in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed, no. No. Congratulations, your bill is passed. And last on our agenda today, and back up again, is House Concurrent Resolution 1010 by Representative Shepard. If you'll introduce yourself, then you are recognized.
Representative Tara Shephard
Unverified
26:43
Good morning, colleagues. Representative Shepard, District 79. And as Madam Chair stated, I'm back up again. I have made the recommendations that were suggested to the resolution, and I would appreciate your support. Thank
Speaker 105
26:58
you. Are there questions on this resolution?
Representative Dolly Henley
Unverified
27:03
Seeing none, we have no one signed up. Is there anyone like to speak on this concurrent resolution?
Okay, Representative Shepard, would you like to close
Representative Tara Shephard
Unverified
27:19
for your resolution? Yes. I would just say, once again, reiterate that I would appreciate your support. When I left out of the committee last week, several of, well, I shouldn't say several, but some stated that my name was brought up once I left, and it was. One of the judges in the end stated Representative Shepard is right. We must do something. So with that, I would appreciate your support. Thank
Speaker 105
27:41
you. What's the will of the committee?
Representative Dolly Henley
Unverified
27:46
We have a motion. Do pass. All in, well, okay, sorry. We have a motion due pass.
Representative Justin Gonzales
Unverified
27:56
All in favor. Is there any discussion on the motion? Representative Gonzalez-Werthin. I want to thank you, Representative Shepard, for bringing this back. I think it's strong and it's definitely needed. Thank you so much. You're welcome. Thank you. Representative Henley, you're recognized. Thank
Representative Dolly Henley
Unverified
28:12
you, Madam Chair. Is there a, and you may have answered this before, and I just absolutely do not remember,
Is there a cost to this study? I don't believe so. I could
Speaker 106
28:23
be mistaken, but if you'd like me to find out, I can do further research for you. Most of the studies just go in the interim when they're done. So it shouldn't be, but I don't want to misspeak. Okay. Thank you, ma'am. You're welcome. Any other
Representative Dolly Henley
Unverified
28:44
discussion on the motion? Okay. We have a motion do pass.
all in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed, no. Congratulations. You have passed your concurrent resolution. Thank you. Seeing no other business before us, committee, we are adjourned.
Agenda
CONCUR IN SENATE AMENDMENT
Number Sponsor Subtitle
HB1669 Bentley TO CREATE THE KEEP KIDS FIRST ACT; AND TO PROVIDE FOR PROTECTIONS FROM DISCRIMINATION FOR ADOPTION AND FOSTER CARE PROVIDERS ACTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SINCERELY HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.
REGULAR AGENDA
Number Sponsor Subtitle
HB1964 Brooks TO MOVE THE CHILD WELFARE OMBUDSMAN DIVISION AND THE JUVENILE OMBUDSMAN DIVISION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTOR GENERAL; AND TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY.
HCR1010 T. Shephard REQUESTING A STUDY OF WAYS TO IMPROVE THE STATE'S JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR YOUTH.
Documents
| Title | Type | Pages | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agenda — AGING, CHILDREN AND YOUTH, LEGISLATIVE & MILITARY AFFAIRS- HOUSE, Apr 7, 2025 | Agenda | 1 | Official source ↗ |
Speakers
Chair
Unverified
Representative Mary Bentley
Unverified
Representative Joy Springer
Unverified
Speaker 17
Representative Glenn Barnes
Unverified
Speaker 24
Representative Dolly Henley
Unverified
Representative Keith Brooks
Unverified
Speaker 51
Speaker 53
Speaker 55
Representative Jason Nazarenko
Unverified
Speaker 61
Speaker 57
Speaker 64
Representative Justin Gonzales
Unverified
Speaker 76
Speaker 78
Speaker 83
Speaker 84
Speaker 79
Speaker 88
Representative Paul Childress
Unverified
Speaker 52
Speaker 71
Speaker 98
Representative Tara Shephard
Unverified
Speaker 105
Speaker 106