Said in CommitteeBeta

Exactly as spoken.

Representative Homer Lenderman

Speaker names can be wrong. Names are identified automatically through voice matching and may contain errors. Always verify speaker attribution against the video before citing it.

Committees

No committee participation found.

Recent Meetings

Date Committee Speaking Time
March 19, 2013 — 628s
March 19, 2013 — 208s
March 18, 2013 — 41s
March 15, 2013 — 271s
March 14, 2013 — 10s
March 14, 2013 — 781s
March 13, 2013 — 55s
March 13, 2013 — 121s
March 8, 2013 — 26s
March 8, 2013 — 37s
March 7, 2013 — 66s
March 6, 2013 — 64s
March 5, 2013 — 40s
March 4, 2013 — 15s
March 1, 2013 — 145s
Feb. 28, 2013 — 1970s
Feb. 27, 2013 — 667s
Feb. 27, 2013 — 105s
Feb. 21, 2013 — 33s
Feb. 19, 2013 — 61s
Feb. 18, 2013 — 14s
Feb. 14, 2013 — 124s
Feb. 13, 2013 — 37s
Feb. 12, 2013 — 47s
Feb. 8, 2013 — 58s
Feb. 5, 2013 — 212s
Feb. 4, 2013 — 54s
Jan. 31, 2013 — 20s
Jan. 30, 2013 — 62s
Jan. 23, 2013 — 29s
Jan. 22, 2013 — 9s
Jan. 17, 2013 — 34s
March 31, 2011 — 33s
March 31, 2011 — 41s
March 30, 2011 — 106s
March 29, 2011 — 137s
March 25, 2011 — 27s
March 25, 2011 — 45s
March 24, 2011 — 16s
March 24, 2011 — 79s
March 23, 2011 — 862s
March 22, 2011 — 18s
March 18, 2011 — 41s
March 16, 2011 — 219s
March 15, 2011 — 17s
March 11, 2011 — 31s
March 10, 2011 — 68s
March 10, 2011 — 5s
March 9, 2011 — 407s
March 7, 2011 — 44s

Recent Transcript Excerpts

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (2:21:00)

we call back in to a special session to address this, or how are we going to address this

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (2:20:38)

to ask your opinion maybe about what you think the eighth circuit may do but if we wait until the eighth circuit rules how would we address this representative hammer appears to be trying to address this in anticipation of the eighth circuit ruling hat would we have to be

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (2:19:53)

we are better off to do nothing until we hear from

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (2:19:43)

Thank you. Representative Linderman. Thank you, Mr. Chair. I think my question is probably for Scott. right

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (2:19:47)

now we're under the gun waiting on the eighth circuit court is it your opinion that

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (39:55)

et cetera, that there are a number of safeguards that are built in that a number of people, both on the local level and on the state level, have to meet these hurdles or show this level of need that would result in before consolidation would take place. is that correct well once they

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (39:39)

had come out of the Oden and PACA study? Okay, one final question, Mr. Chair. Dr. Kimbrell, in your testimony, you indicated that there were a number of safeguards. If they fell below the number two years, the consolidation of the boards, the appeals process,

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (38:46)

When the Lakeview was in progress, there was a – Governor Huckabee recommended a 1,500, and I believe the House passed the 500 number, and the Senate, I think, amended it down to 350. Is that correct? You'd probably need to get someone like Tony Wood, who was

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (37:42)

and Arkansas went from 1,700 schools to 400-plus. Is that correct? You're reaching

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (37:09)

Okay, Education Week magazine, if I'm not mistaken, actually gave Arkansas an A-minus rating on school funding. Is that correct? I believe that's correct, sir. I believe so. I was thinking I remembered that from some testimony in another deal. The number 350 actually goes back to the late 1940s, if memory serves me correct, that the legislature passed legislation that said all school districts that did not have 350 pupils would be consolidated,

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (36:36)

we could very well be back into the Lakeview lawsuit, a lawsuit against our state for not providing adequate education. Is that correct? yes to that but

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (36:02)

We need to comply with the law. If I understood your testimony, we are in compliance with the law, and

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (36:23)

year after each consolidation. So Arkansas is in compliance with the law? Yes, sir. Okay. Scott, I think this question is for you. All right. If I understood you, if this bill passed, 1938 today,

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (35:28)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. With your indulgence, I have several questions. I have received, as everyone on this committee has, a lot of messages that were copied and pasted. Some of them said that we need to support our children, and I spent 30 years in education. Both my children teach in small rural schools, and I certainly support education. But it says that we are currently in violation of ACA 613-1606 of 2005 and a 2003 Supreme Court order.

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (1:04:05)

I do not have a list of those schools. But beginning in 2014, that would be an issue for them. There's no question. By the way, happy birthday. And there is no doubt that that would be a question and one of the factors that they do have to deal with. But, again, it is a small amount of money. If you do $19 a month, I believe we come out to just a little in excess of $200 a year per employee that takes the insurance as to the cost per district. Thank you very much.

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (1:04:02)

seven schools that are characterized as being in physical distress.

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (1:03:56)

distress? How are they going to meet this expense? Okay. As a testimony this morning, there are, I believe,

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (1:03:14)

a companion bill that's being worked on that would put some money into the Employee Benefits Division, which would hopefully help curtail the increases in the future. So this bill that

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (1:02:57)

is paying another, an additional $178 per month beginning this

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (1:02:49)

this is that a teacher with a goal plan with their family and their spouse on the program

Bills Discussed

No bills found.

← Back to all legislators