House State Agencies & Govt'l Affairs Committee Part 1
Video
Transcript
Bills discussed (22)
| Bill | Title | Sponsor | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HB2020
· 5 mentions in chapter, transcript
Matched: “HB2020”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HCR1009
· 4 mentions in transcript, chapter
Matched: “…ank you. Yes, sir. We're going now to Representative Hobbs, House Concurrent Resolution 1009-1010-2161.”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HB1739
· 3 mentions in chapter, transcript
Matched: “HB1739”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
SB862
· 3 mentions in chapter, transcript
Matched: “SB862”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HB1909
· 2 mentions in chapter, transcript
Matched: “HB1909”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HB2161
· 2 mentions in transcript, chapter
Matched: “…passed your amendment. You're ready to present your bill on House Bill 2161, Representative Hough.”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
SB782
· 2 mentions in transcript
Matched: “…for those members, people who may be in the audience, this Senate Bill 782 will not be heard until upon adjournment this afternoon. We…”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HB1024
· 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “House Bill 1984. House Bill 1024. House Bill 2013. House Bill 2020.”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HB1885
· 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “…ne, yes. Senate Bill 763, House Bill 2145, House Bill 2148, House Bill 1885.”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HB1969
· 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “…now we're going down to, we're going to take them in order. House Bill 1969, Cheatham.”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HB1984
· 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “House Bill 1984. House Bill 1024. House Bill 2013. House Bill 2020.”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HB2013
· 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “House Bill 1984. House Bill 1024. House Bill 2013. House Bill 2020.”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HB21
· 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “…t the amendment. We have a motion to adopt the amendment on House Bill 21-61. All in favor say aye.”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HB2133
· 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “excuse me. We'll go to House Bill 2133. 2130. 2147.”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HB2145
· 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “…we've already taken care of that one, yes. Senate Bill 763, House Bill 2145, House Bill 2148, House Bill 1885.”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HB2148
· 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “…en care of that one, yes. Senate Bill 763, House Bill 2145, House Bill 2148, House Bill 1885.”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
HCR1010
· 1 mention in chapter
Matched: “HCR1010”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
SB1885
· 1 mention in chapter
Matched: “SB1885”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
SB258
· 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “have 2155, 1322, 2093, Senate Bill 258,”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
SB763
· 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “Senate Bill 862, we've already taken care of that one, yes. Senate Bill 763, House Bill 2145, House Bill 2148, House Bill 1885.”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
SB8
· 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “…able, or we can get started here. This is going to be 8-62, Senate Bill 8-62.”
|
Pre-2017 bill | ||
|
SR5
· 1 mention in chapter
Matched: “SR5”
|
Pre-2017 bill |
Machine transcript
May contain errors. Verify important quotations against the official video.
About transcript accuracy
- Source
- Whisper
- Model
- ggml-large-v3-turbo.bin RTX5060
- Processing date
- October 5, 2026
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
0:00
Bill 862, Representative Perry, are you ready to run your bill? If you would, if you would set it in the table and you're ready to present your bill, if I could get all the members to the table, please. May I have all the members to the table, or we can get started here. This is going to be 8-62, Senate Bill 8-62.
Representative Mark Perry
Unverified
0:36
You are ready to present your bill. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, committee. As we finalize this session, it's nice to have a simple bill. Senate Bill 862 addresses the Electronic Recording Commission and increases the members from 9 to 11, requires that one of the members be an active state legislator, and then ask BLR to help in the assisting on the administration of it.
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
1:10
Is it any cost? It is no cost, sir. No cost. Any questions from the committee? no questions committee is anyone in audience like
to speak against this bill for it what's the pleasure of the committee we have a motion to pass all in favor say aye any opposed say no you pass your amendment a bill thank you mr chairman thank you committee we're going down to uh house joint resolution senate joint resolution number five uh senator
Senator, are you here to present your resolution? If you would, take the end of the table, and you're ready to proceed. Thank you, Mr. Chairman,
Speaker 7
1:52
members of the committee. I don't want to belabor the point. You guys have all heard it when we had the joint committees. I put an amendment on, and this takes all state revenues out of the star bond portion and makes it local taxes only. The governor's office, DF&A, everyone is on board with this, and I still think we have an opportunity to make a difference and give a good economic incentive tool.
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
2:14
I'll be happy to answer any questions. As I understand it, Senator, this has been engrossed into
Speaker 7
2:18
the bill, the amendment. Yes, sir. Yes, sir, it has. It was a simple amendment. It just took state out and added city and county or local in place of state. Is
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
2:28
there any questions from the committee? Has anyone in the committee in this audience like to speak
against this? For it? Press the player to the committee. I have a motion due pass. All in favor say aye. Any opposed? You've passed your joint resolution.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, members of the committee. We're going to, now we're going to take the calendar up with the, in the order of, in the current
Senate amendments. I think the first one up is House
Speaker 14
3:07
Bill 1909. Representative Cowling, you've got to run that bill. I don't have care in the world.
Speaker 13
3:14
So I just said, let's pass the Burroughs, call me and ask the submission. I see the gun I've done. I'll show you if I'm going to ask you. Will you help me get that out? Get that out? I said, yeah. I'd be mad. That's right. I'm going to see if it's in faith or something. But I'm going to
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
3:34
do it. All right. Good. Representative Cowley, you're We're ready to present House Bill 1909.
Representative Larry Cowling
Unverified
3:38
Thank you, Mr. Chair. This is just an amendment that the Senate put on for Representative Allen and just makes a bill a little bit better and all.
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
3:51
Any questions to the committee? Appreciate a good
vote. Anyone in the audience like to speak against the bill for it? Watch the players of the committee. We have a motion due passed. All in favor say aye. Any opposed? Pass your bill. We're going now to House Bill 1739. Representative Letting, are you ready? Representative Cheatham. I am. You're ready to present your bill. Your concurrent Senate amendment.
Representative Greg Leding
Unverified
4:22
I'm sorry. Yes, thank you, Mr. Chair, members of the committee. House Bill 1739 dealt with temporary appointments by a civil service board. There was some contention between the amount of time to make those appointments. We got it out of the House with the time limit set at 45 days. Our colleagues in the Senate decided it would be better set at 60 days. So that's the only change. They now have 60 days to make those appointments. Any questions from the committee, Representative Tyler?
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
4:52
Motion at the proper time. So noted. Any other questions from the committee?
If anyone in the audience would like to speak against this, Farad, Representative Tyler? Wait a minute. Are you close for your? I am. Representative Tyler? Motion do pass. We have a motion do pass. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? You passed your bill. Thank you. Yes, sir. We're going now to Representative Hobbs, House Concurrent Resolution 1009-1010-2161.
That will be the order in which we're going to hear these. Representative Hobbs, if you'll take the end of the table,
Representative Debra M. Hobbs
Unverified
5:41
you're ready to present House Concurrent Resolution 1009. Thank you, Ms. Chair. Good morning, Committee. This first resolution, 1009, simply urges Congress to resolve our immigration policy issues or give the states the authority to address those issues.
I don't think I need to say a whole lot more. We have set-through committee meetings where people on both sides of illegal immigration issues have testified. Again, this is just a resolution as representatives of the people of Arkansas. I think we need to encourage Congress to act upon this, and I'd
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
6:19
appreciate a good vote. Any questions on House Concurrent Resolution 1009? is it mandatory
Representative Debra M. Hobbs
Unverified
6:28
or is this just a it's a resolution just encouraging them
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
6:34
to act upon it any questions from the committee anyone in audience would like to speak against this resolution for it what's the pleasure of the committee I'd like to move do pass we have a motion do pass all in favor say aye all opposed President Haas, I'm sorry, but apparently you did
Speaker 41
6:56
not support it. Maybe I should have spoken.
Let's try 10-10. I'm trying
Representative Debra M. Hobbs
Unverified
7:01
to make it easy on you, okay? This is also a resolution. He's a first, ma'am. Exactly. This is also a resolution that was presented last term. Some people told me afterwards that if it came back again, they would support it. And I told some people that asked me if I would run it again that I would, and so this is it.
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
7:30
Is there any questions from the committee?
Is anyone from the audience like to speak for or against this proposal? Are you closed for your presentation? I am closed. Appreciate a good vote, and I move that this pass. We have a motion to do pass on 10-10. All in favor say aye. All opposed? I apologize. That's okay. Try again. That's going to have to do 21-61. You're going to try 21-61? I am, and there is an amendment.
Speaker 35
8:04
We have an amendment. We're passing out the amendment now. I need a
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
8:11
motion to adopt the amendment. We have a motion to adopt the amendment on House Bill 21-61. All in favor say aye.
Any opposed? You passed your amendment. You're ready to present your bill on House Bill 2161, Representative Hough.
Representative Debra M. Hobbs
Unverified
8:24
Thank you, Mr. Chair. And I need some guidance from some people here as to
whether we want to put this in interim study or to go ahead and present the bill. Could I have just a moment?
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
8:34
Absolutely. Thank you. Yes, ma'am. In fact, until I get back, you have until I get back in this seat. Yes, ma'am.
Representative Debra M. Hobbs
Unverified
9:13
Thank you, Mr. Chair. I do have a question, if I may. Yes,
ma'am. If this bill should fail, do we still have the option of putting it in an interim study? No, ma'am. So we need
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
9:23
to decide now. According to my parliamentarian. Okay. And your desire? Interim study. Okay, then
Speaker 39
9:35
in that case, we'd like to refer this to interim study, please. Yeah, I have a motion to
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
9:40
refer this to interim study. I so move. All in favor, say aye.
Any opposed? You passed your request on 2161. Okay, now we're going down to, we're going to take them in order. House Bill 1969, Cheatham.
House Bill 1984. House Bill 1024. House Bill 2013. House Bill 2020.
House Bill 2020, Representative Hubbard. You're welcome to the end
of the table to present your bill on House Bill 2020. You ready to present your bill, Representative Hubbard? Yes, sir. Is there any amendments or anything involved, or is this engrossed? No, sir. This is okay. This is ready. All right, sir. You're ready. Okay. I'm
John Hubbard
Unverified
10:41
just going to basically read the title of this bill. It's an act requiring candidates for president and vice president of the United States
to provide evidence of their qualifications for office
to have their name appear on an Arkansas election ballot. Is
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
10:59
there any questions on House Bill 2020? Representative Steele. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Representative Nate Steel
Unverified
11:07
Representative Hubbard, are we certain that we have the authority to provide our own rules on a state level as far as what presidential candidates have to, what kind of information
John Hubbard
Unverified
11:18
they have to give us? I'm not really establishing any rate or any rules, just the rules that are already in place. In the 2008 election, the Democratic National Committee sent out letters to states to put people on the ballot. There was two versions of a letter. One went to Hawaii that was certifying the candidates, and the other version went to the other 49 states, which did not certify the candidates. And all I'm saying is that we need to – this law will require that the candidates' qualifications are available and ready for review before they can be added to an Arkansas election
Representative Nate Steel
Unverified
11:56
ballot. And would this apply to both primaries as well as the general
Representative Linda S. Tyler
Unverified
12:06
election? Yes. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Representative Hubbard, if I ask you a question, will
Speaker 64
12:13
you promise not to have a heart attack? No, ma'am.
Speaker 65
12:16
I will not promise that. I thought you were going to do your... Fred Sanford immigration. I
Representative Linda S. Tyler
Unverified
12:23
thought about that. That's what I was wanting. Do you think that this does require a higher threshold for the presidential candidate than
John Hubbard
Unverified
12:29
any other candidate on our ballot? Yes, ma'am, it does because the qualifications for president are a little bit different than any other candidate. With a natural born, and again, this is not a birther bill, okay, because it has nothing to do with where anybody is born. It's just the definition of natural born citizens as contained in Fattel's Law of Nations, that this was the version used when the Constitution was written. and they give a specific definition of what a natural-born citizen is
as opposed to what a native-born or any other type of citizen is. And I'm just saying that we'll need to follow the constitutional requirements and make sure any candidate is certified that they do fit those qualifications according to the
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
13:22
Constitution. Thank you, sir. Yes, ma'am. Any other questions from the committee? Representative Hubbard. Yes, sir. For my information only, and just to educate me, you state here, you say the long-form birth certificate.
Speaker 53
13:36
Yes, sir. And I see the definition. What is
John Hubbard
Unverified
13:41
a short-form birth certificate? Well, I don't know there is any such thing as a short-form. There is a long-form, and it would stand to reason there would be a short-form, but I don't know what that would be. a long-form birth certificate as opposed to a certificate of live birth, which does not list the doctors or witnesses or the hospital or anything else that's involved. That would be
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
14:05
like if a person was born at home in their own home?
Speaker 41
14:09
Yes, sir. I'm just being, I'm trying to get educated on this
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
14:20
one. Any other questions from the committee? We have several people signed up, I think, to
speak on this bill. We'll start with the AG's office. Are you here, Representative, from Erica? If you would, if you take the end of the table, state your name, what agency you're with, and you may present your case.
Speaker 75
14:41
Good morning. Erica Gee, Assistant Attorney General. We're here to testify against this bill today because it does add to the requirements in the federal constitution to be eligible to run for president or vice president. What is added to the requirements is that the presidential and vice presidential nominees have to file an affidavit swearing, among other things, that the candidate has not held dual or multiple citizenship and that the candidate's allegiance is solely to the United
States of America. Both of those points are not in the federal constitution, so they are adding to the eligibility requirements to be run for president or vice president. There's very well-established case law that states do not have the power to add or change the eligibility requirements for federal office. They may only be changed through a constitutional amendment. For example, in 1995, there was an Arkansas case on term limits in which the Arkansas Supreme Court struck it down as unconstitutionally adding to requirements for federal office,
and that decision was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court. In addition to that, I want to point out that there may be a constitutional issue with one other part of the bill. It also requires presidential and vice-presidential candidates to file a copy of a long-form birth certificate. A long-form birth certificate, which, as they explain, requires the name of the hospital, the name of the doctor who attended, signatures of the witnesses and so forth, there are some states who do not provide that information on birth certificates that they would provide
a candidate for someone who was born in that state. So because not all states would provide that type of information as a birth certificate in that state, it could be that that provision would be unconstitutional as a violation of full faith and credit requirement, which requires all the states to give full faith and credit to the records of other states. Are you through with your presentation? Yes, sir. Are you going to take
Speaker 76
16:43
questions? I will. Are there any questions from the committee? None? Well, thank you for your testimony.
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
16:52
Thank you. Is anyone in the audience who speaks for this proposal? We have a Mr. Is it Mike Jacobs? No, this is for another bill. Ah, another bill. I'm sorry. Has anyone in audience spoken against this bill for it? Representative Hubbard,
John Hubbard
Unverified
17:16
are you ready to close for your bill? Yes, sir. I would mention that Vattel's Law of Nations is actually
referred to in the U.S. Constitution as a means of identifying certain parts of the Constitution.
it's in article one section eight of the constitution where it says the congress shall have power to define and punish piracies and
felonies committed on the high seas and offenses against the law of nations and the law of nations is capitalized meaning it is the title of a document. It goes on to say,
Natural Born is a separate class of citizen for a very important reason. The Founding Fathers wanted to make sure that any citizen who served as president owed their allegiance, commitment, and fiduciary responsibility first and foremost to the United States of America and not to some foreign nation or power. Patel's Law of Nation defines natural born citizens are those born in the country of parents who were citizens and that the country of the father is therefore that of the children
and these become true citizens merely by that tacit consent. And during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, discussions between founding fathers John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington acknowledged that the definition provided by Vattel's Law of Nations was the better choice to define how natural born differed from native born, a classification of citizenship that is given to those simply born in the United States. And that's where my reasoning comes from to present this bill, that the documentation
is in the Constitution. It's listed as a document used to define what a natural born citizen is, although it has not really been used to bring this point out very often. So I am closer with my bill, sir. Thank you. We've
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
19:27
heard Senator Hubbard close for his bill. What is the wish of the committee? Could I bring one
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
19:42
Without objection, yes, sir. Okay. And all
John Hubbard
Unverified
19:44
I'm saying is, just like it says in the title of the bill, that all this is doing is requiring that candidates for president and vice president be required to
provide evidence that they are qualified according to the Constitution to seek this office. Are you
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
19:58
now closing your bill? Yes, sir. What's the will
of the committee? Resident Herbert, not having a do-pass motion, I'm afraid we'll have to decline your bill.
John Hubbard
Unverified
20:12
Since I've been up here twice, can I
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
20:15
make a motion to do pass? No, sir.
Speaker 48
20:18
You're not a member of this committee. But I understand. Thank you, though, for your
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
20:27
presentation. Yes, sir. Thank you. For clarification for those members, people who may be in the audience, this Senate Bill 782 will not be heard until upon adjournment this afternoon. We have several bills, and we have some other issues that's going to be before the committee,
and some of the rest are going to have to leave fairly early. So if you're here for Senate Bill 782, we will hear that this afternoon upon adjournment. So y'all won't have to say it for as long. Okay, excuse me. Now,
Speaker 48
21:02
excuse me. We'll go to House Bill 2133. 2130. 2147.
2149, 2155, do we
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
21:34
have 2155, 1322, 2093, Senate Bill 258,
Senate Bill 862, we've already taken care of that one, yes. Senate Bill 763, House Bill 2145, House Bill 2148, House Bill 1885.
Oh, where are we? 1885.
1885, Representative Lee. You have an amendment we're passing out now.
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
23:16
Representative Lee, are you ready to present your amendment? Thank you,
Speaker 89
23:39
Mr. Chairman. All this basically did was tighten the map up so the deep
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
23:44
We need to get your amendment adopted into the bill first, I believe.
Representative Bernard? We have a motion to adopt the amendment. All in favor say aye. All opposed? You've adopted your
Speaker 90
24:01
amendment. Ready to present your bill as amended. Thank you, sir. All
Speaker 91
24:05
this did was change a couple more precincts to tighten the numbers up. So currently the numbers are at 0000. I have them written in my BlackBerry because I failed to print out my e-mail.
Speaker 93
24:22
So, well, I'll just get a piece of paper.
Speaker 94
24:37
It's not on the back of mine. Can I have it in, please? Thank you,
Speaker 91
24:47
ma'am. Sorry, I failed to – it's not on the back of mine down here, or is it on the back of the map? Thank you.
So it tightened up the numbers even further,
Speaker 97
25:00
as you can see, and that's all I'm wanting to present today. Ready
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
25:05
for questions? Yes. Thank you. Any questions from the committee? Representative Cowling.
Representative Larry Cowling
Unverified
25:09
Thank you, Mr. Chair. Isn't this one similar to Pritchard's bill that he presented this morning, Senator Pritchard's bill? I'm sorry. I
Speaker 91
25:17
was not aware of Pritchard's bill. Where is he? Oh, you mean down in Senate State Agency?
Speaker 90
25:23
Yes. Yes, Senator Pritchard asked me about my map, and I told him I was putting an amendment in down here.
Representative Larry Cowling
Unverified
25:31
But, I mean, it's the same one that he
Speaker 90
25:34
had. Okay. I'll believe you. I was not present in Senate State Agencies today,
Speaker 91
25:42
sir. Okay. You got that? All this did was change up a couple precincts for the
Speaker 20
25:52
purpose of tightening the numbers even further. Representative, are you through, Representative Rogers?
Representative Tiffany Rogers
Unverified
25:59
Thank you, Mr. Chair. Representative Lee, are you aware that Arkansas County has the Northern and Southern District in its courts? I am now. Okay, and this map does not follow that? No, ma'am, it does not. And how would you explain or how would you – what would you offer in that respect on how this would affect them and how it would work in that respect? I
Speaker 90
26:20
think you'd probably be better at offering that. All I can tell you is I went for the tightest numbers possible. And, yes, that would have been
Speaker 91
26:26
a good thing to do in Arkansas County, and I was not able to get that done.
Representative Debra M. Hobbs
Unverified
26:32
Thank you. Any other questions? Representative Hobbs? MS. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Representative Lee, it may be right in front of me, but I'm not seeing it right now. So Arkansas counties and Johnson counties, are they the
Speaker 90
26:54
only two counties that are split? MR. Correct. Four counties were moved and two counties were split
Representative Debra M. Hobbs
Unverified
26:59
with the tightest deviation so far. MS. Okay. And I don't see the Arkansas counties split on the amendment.
Is it already? MR. Yes. If you look at the map, you'll be able to see it real clearly. MS. Okay. We also see that you have fewer people in the third district? Yes, ma'am. Okay. Was that because of past history where that district tends to
Speaker 90
27:26
grow more rapidly? Correct. And so we took the
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
27:31
precincts were tightened up in Johnson County. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Any questions? President Lee, as I understand it, and we need a clarification, one-half of 1% seems
to be the deviation allowance. Is that not the standard understanding of congressional districts? You can't have up to one-half of 1% deviation and still stay within the intent of the congressional redistricting? Is that a fair statement? That's a fair statement. Thank you. Any questions from the committee? Does anyone
in the audience like to speak against this proposal for it?
You close, Reverend Lee? Yes, sir. I move, do pass. We have a motion, do pass on amendment of 1885. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Aye. And then another hand.
All right, roll call it. We need
a motion to do pass as amended.
That was your motion, wasn't it, Representative Lee? Representative Lee. That was
Speaker 102
29:02
your motion to do pass as amended. Representative Cheatham. Representative Gardner, Representative Roebuck. Representative Hedgeson, Representative Hedgeson, Representative Kaling, Representative Penards,
Representative Baird, Representative Hobbs, Representative Lee, Representative Wilkins, Representative Wilkins Representative Tyler Representative Tyler Representative Hopper Representative Klemmer Representative Nichols Representative Nichols Representative McLean Representative McLean Representative Rogers
Representative Steele Representative Steele Representative Vines Yes. Representative Slinkard?
Speaker 57
30:11
Yes. Representative Hall? No. It failed for the lack of getting 11
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
30:16
votes, Representative Lee. Okay. Let's move on.
Bill 1890, Senate Bill 257, Senate Bill 975, House Bill 1039. Ladies and gentlemen
of the committee, the problem is we have some senators that would like to run their bills this afternoon. They were in meetings this morning, and we've got this Senate Bill 782 that is going to be heard this afternoon on the request of a representative of the Senator.
So we will be meeting upon adjournment this afternoon in room 130. No, if we change it back, it's going to be
Speaker 108
30:59
here in 151 on adjournment. Upon adjournment.
Representative Tracy Pennartz
Unverified
31:10
Ma'am? Mr. Chair, if we recess, that has to coincide with the Senate
in order for the Senate to be here, I guess. So it is upon adjournment.
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
31:31
Call up the chair. We will call it based on trying to adjust with the Senate end to see when they can be down here to run their bills. We will either meet upon recess or upon adjournment according to what the Senate and we can work out as a cooperative effort. And it will be announced at the
Representative Tracy Pennartz
Unverified
31:54
in the assembly this afternoon. Upon the call of the chair and
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
31:58
we'll just wait to hear from you, sir. Absolutely. We
will announce it early enough for a two-hour notice, it has been made notice.
Unknown speaker
32:06
We will meet this afternoon sometime.
Agenda
Call to Order
SB862
SR5
HB1909
HB1739
HCR1009
HCR1010
HB2161
HB2020
SB1885
Adjournment
Documents
No documents posted.
Speakers
Representative Clark Hall
Unverified
Representative Mark Perry
Unverified
Speaker 7
Speaker 14
Speaker 13
Representative Larry Cowling
Unverified
Representative Greg Leding
Unverified
Representative Debra M. Hobbs
Unverified
Speaker 41
Speaker 35
Speaker 39
John Hubbard
Unverified
Representative Nate Steel
Unverified
Representative Linda S. Tyler
Unverified
Speaker 64
Speaker 65
Speaker 53
Speaker 75
Speaker 76
Speaker 81
Speaker 48
Speaker 89
Speaker 90
Speaker 91
Speaker 93
Speaker 94
Speaker 97
Speaker 20
Representative Tiffany Rogers
Unverified
Speaker 102
Speaker 57
Speaker 108
Representative Tracy Pennartz
Unverified