Said in CommitteeBeta

Exactly as spoken.

JBC-Special Language

March 18, 2025 ·9:00 AM ·Room A, MAC ·36:56
Video Transcript 3 documents

Bills discussed (16)
Bill Title Sponsor Status
HB1127 Act 543 · 2 mentions in agenda, transcript
Matched: “…tions - Division of Correction (DJC018) - Senator Hickey 7. HB1127 - Dept. of Education - Arkansas State Library - (KMW042) -…”
 AN ACT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION - ARKANSAS STATE LIBRARY APPROPRIATION FOR THE 2025-2026 … Joint Budget Committee Notification that HB1127 is now Act 543
HB1202 Act 1006 · 2 mentions in agenda, transcript
Matched: “…mendments referred to the Special Language Subcommittee: 1. HB1202 - Department of Finance and Administration - Disbursing Off…”
 AN ACT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION - DISBURSING OFFICER APPROPRIATION FOR THE … Joint Budget Committee Notification that HB1202 is now Act 1006
HB1389 Act 547 · 1 mention in agenda
Matched: “…n of Aging, Adult and Behavioral Health - Senator Payton 3. HB1389 - DHS - Division of Developmental Disabilities - Jonesboro…”
 AN ACT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES - DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SERVICES - … Ladyman Notification that HB1389 is now Act 547
HB1577 · 1 mention in agenda
Matched: “…al Disabilities - Jonesboro HDC - Representative Ladyman 4. HB1577 - Department of Commerce - Insurance Department - Represent…”
 AN ACT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE - STATE INSURANCE DEPARTMENT - GRANTS FOR PERPETUAL … Crawford Died in House Committee at Sine Die adjournment.
HB1635 · 1 mention in agenda
Matched: “…n of Elementary and Secondary Education - Senator Hammer 8. HB1635 - DFA- Disbursing Officer - Grant for Teaching Veterinarian…”
 AN ACT FOR A GRANT FOR AN ARKANSAS TEACHING VETERINARIAN HOSPITAL AT THE LITTLE ROCK … McCullough Died in House Committee at Sine Die adjournment.
SB106 Act 898 · 1 mention in agenda
Matched: “…n - Disbursing Officer (JAP016) - Representative Collins 2. SB106 - Department of Agriculture (BSS023) - Senator Irvin 3. SB8…”
 AN ACT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE APPROPRIATION FOR THE 2025-2026 FISCAL YEAR. Joint Budget Committee Notification that SB106 is now Act 898
SB130 Act 534 · 1 mention in agenda
Matched: “…ate Parks and Tourism Divisions (WFP019) - Senator Irvin 4. SB130 - Arkansas State University - Senator Dismang (HAR051) 5. H…”
 AN ACT FOR THE ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY APPROPRIATION FOR THE 2025-2026 FISCAL YEAR. Joint Budget Committee Notification that SB130 is now Act 534
SB184 · 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “…e got a big problem. As many of you know, um, I had a bill, Senate Bill 184, that would have removed the state library board and the AE…”
 TO TRANSFER THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION COMMISSION AND THE STATE … D. Sullivan Died in House Committee at Sine Die adjournment.
SB201 · 1 mention in agenda
Matched: “…ent - Division of Environmental Quality - Senator Payton 2. SB201 - DHS - Division of Aging, Adult and Behavioral Health - Se…”
 AN ACT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES - DIVISION OF AGING, ADULT, AND BEHAVIORAL … J. Payton Died in Senate Committee at Sine Die adjournment.
SB354 · 1 mention in agenda
Matched: “…overnor's Letter #13 - DFA - Disbursing Officer (JAP021) 6. SB354 - Department of Corrections - Division of Correction (DJC01…”
 AN ACT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS - DIVISION OF CORRECTION DEVELOPMENT AND ENHANCEMENT CAPITAL … J. Dismang Died on the Senate Budget Calendar Having Failed …
SB359 Act 613 · 1 mention in agenda
Matched: “…ommerce - Insurance Department - Representative Crawford 5. SB359 - Dept. of Education - Division of Elementary and Secondary…”
 AN ACT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION - DIVISION OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION OUT-OF-SCHOOL … J. Petty Notification that SB359 is now Act 613
SB360 · 1 mention in agenda
Matched: “…on of Elementary and Secondary Education - Senator Petty 6. SB360 - Dept. of Education - Division of Elementary and Secondary…”
 AN ACT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION - DIVISION OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION OUT-OF-SCHOOL … J. Petty Died in Senate Committee at Sine Die adjournment.
SB362 · 1 mention in agenda
Matched: “…on of Elementary and Secondary Education - Senator Petty 7. SB362 - Dept. of Education - Division of Elementary and Secondary…”
 AN ACT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION - DIVISION OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION YOUTH … K. Hammer Died on House Calendar at Sine Die adjournment.
SB372 · 1 mention in transcript
Matched: “I've got it right here on Senate Bill 372. The judge had many things that appropriateness, we need to…”
 TO AMEND THE LAW CONCERNING THE SIGNAL LEGEND OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES; AND TO ALLOW … A. Clark Died on Senate Calendar at Sine Die adjournment.
SB8 · 1 mention in agenda
Matched: “…C. Bills referred to the Special Language Subcommittee: 1. SB8 - Department of Energy and Environment - Division of Enviro…”
 AN ACT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT - DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY SUPPLEMENTAL … J. Payton Died in Senate Committee at Sine Die adjournment.
SB81 Act 897 · 1 mention in agenda
Matched: “…106 - Department of Agriculture (BSS023) - Senator Irvin 3. SB81 - Department of Parks, Heritage, and Tourism - State Parks…”
 AN ACT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, HERITAGE, AND TOURISM - STATE PARKS AND TOURISM … Joint Budget Committee Notification that SB81 is now Act 897

Official video page ↗

Transcript

Transcript available SliQ live captions ✓ Whisper ✓ Download .txt
Machine transcript

May contain errors. Verify important quotations against the official video.

About transcript accuracy
Source
Whisper
Model
ggml-large-v3-turbo.bin
Processing date
October 8, 2026
Speaker 1 0:00
Thank
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 4 0:13
you. Thank you. Thank
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 1 1:16
you.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 4 1:30
Thank you. Thank you.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Lee Johnson Chair Unverified 2:30
morning chair sees a quorum everybody could get to their seats we'll go ahead and get started this morning i don't see him yet uh members before we get started uh if i could have everyone's attention I want to remind members of the committee of a few things specifically around how this how committee here works with regard to passing bills not passing bills it takes eight votes eight yes votes to get a bill out of this committee and so when I'm asked to call a vote I'm not just listening for the loudness of the vote but I'm looking for how many people vote yes a silence on a no vote is a no so if I hear two people say real loudly yes and I hear no one say no, that is not a passing bill in this committee. So I will need to hear what I think is eight votes to get a bill out. So it's not just strictly on the sound. I'm going to be listening for that. So just reminding everyone of that process so that if you hear a couple of people say yes and nobody say no and I say the bill's failed, everyone understands that that means I saw more no votes by consent than yes votes to pass. So just reminding everyone that as the process goes along we haven't had a lot of special language meetings where that's coming to play but we got a big agenda today and it could potentially come into play so just reminding uh first up on the agenda uh senator payton here i don't i do not see him in his usual usual place we'll pass over items one and two we're passing over three passing over four passing over five six seven eight i think we're passing over everything in item c so without objection we'll move on to item d uh representative collins are you prepared to present item d one amendment amendment to house bill 1202 you can do it from your chair as far as i'm concerned i think it's the member's preference we're working on some technical difficulties here it looks like it looks like I've got
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Andrew Collins Unverified 5:07
you on I got you now okay thank you this is just some some cleanup language really there are two public legal aid organizations in the state they're merging and so this just strikes the one that's going away and leaving the one that's remaining there's no change in funding it's that's remaining the same it's just getting rid of that one that's going away happy to answer any
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Lee Johnson Chair Unverified 5:31
questions members are there any questions yes senator Hickey you are wrecking
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Jimmy Hickey, Jr Unverified 5:39
so I apologize here for not one of them says 45 percent the other one says 55 percent so and we're striking both of those what what what exactly does that mean well so
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Andrew Collins Unverified 5:50
that means that that split won't happen and just the 100 percent will go to the remaining entity which is legal aid of arkansas they used to have they've split their territories in the past and currently 31 counties were for legal aid of arkansas and the 44 counties were for CALS, Central Arkansas Legal Services, and now both territories will be done by the same entity. That's kind of a common
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Jimmy Hickey, Jr Unverified 6:13
sense deal. We don't need language within this that would say that 100% is going to go to that fund or anything. We don't believe. We just think that's automatic. I think
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Andrew Collins Unverified 6:23
because of the way it's going to read after this striking, it'll say that the fund shall be used for providing financial support for public legal aid organizations and distributed to Legal Aid of Arkansas. I think that implies 100%. I think you're right. Thank you, sir. Appreciate it. members are there any other questions
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Lee Johnson Chair Unverified 6:39
seeing none do we have a motion motion adopt the amendment we have a second second all those in favor say aye opposed the amendment is adopted we'll move on now to i think the next item that we're going to hear on the agenda is item five i think this is on page 20 and 22 of your packet and is there someone from DF&A here that would come and present the governor's letter amending 1202 you just state your name for the committee when you get seated and you recognize to present Andy Babbitt DFA you recognize let me find it in my packet here. If you're looking at our packet it's page 20
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 34 7:57
through 22. So this is simply to make a biennial report of the ARPA report that we send currently monthly to ALC. It'll go to biennial and then it'll in six months after our final disbursement for arpa this was discussed in the senate revenue and tax and was brought forward to this committee in special language members are there any questions for mr bobbitt seeing no questions have a motion
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Lee Johnson Chair Unverified 8:35
to adopt the amendment motion we got a second second all those in favor say aye opposed amendments adopted thank you I think the next item on the agenda that we're going to hear is going to be item seven center Sullivan are you prepared to present item seven do you want to present from there would you like to come to the table okay so on
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Unknown speaker 8:51
page 26 through 30 of your packet members You just state your name for the committee for the record.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified 9:25
Thank you, sir. Senator Dan Sullivan, uh, district 20 you recognize to present your amendment. Thank you, Mr. Chair. This amendment, I think if you have it in front of you, it allows the, many of our state libraries receive state funds via grants, and that's in the bill. This amendment to the bill would prevent any libraries who have an affiliation or membership with the American Library Association from receiving state aid. Folks, I've met with librarians and libraries more than I can count and gave them an opportunity to work together. We have oversight responsibilities on the libraries, especially how we distribute funds. That's what HB 1127 says. There are a number of states who have done this, including are very similar, who have disassociated, disaffiliated with the ALA, including Montana, Missouri, Texas, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Arizona, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Idaho and Tennessee. All of those already have language that does something similar to this are exactly the same of this Many of them have most of those. I just read have completely disaffiliated with them Some of the ones I read have language pending to do so The American Library Association is a national organization for libraries they are And as many of our national associations go, they tend to lean to the left or right depending on where the money goes. And right now at the federal level, previously they were leaning further towards a more liberal lean. They say that they represent everybody. But when you look at their website and you look at what they do, they're big fighters for climate change. They're big fighters for DEI. On and on, there's no end to the list as to what they're promoting. While they claim that they are for everybody and we're going to have books and materials for everybody, they clearly have an agenda. Last week at a board meeting for the state library, the topic came up, will the state library develop policies to protect children? Will they develop policies to protect children? One of the board members said, we already do that. And then they voted against writing those policies down. Folks, we are a body of policy. You know how many times we fight over may and shall, or will and can and can't? All the time, it's what we do is develop policy. And if our state library or the county libraries do not want to develop policy to protect children, that's a big deal. And if you already do it, why do you fight so hard against it? It just doesn't make any sense to me. Just write down what you already do. And the policy, of course, is non-binding. The state library board cannot make binding policy on county libraries. It's just, again, a real quandary to me why something so simple and easy they refuse to do. I guess the biggest part of my position against them, and I hope yours will be, In the library Bill of Rights that they say is the big First Amendment right, the Bill of Rights of the American Library Association says that we will not prevent anyone, any age or any mentality, we will not prevent anyone from accessing books or materials. Materials means movies and such. We will not block anybody from getting that based on their age. Folks, that's a problem. Our state library board, when asked if they supported that, said no unofficially. However, when it came time to vote, they refused to vote to change that policy. We've got a big conflict between whether or not the state board understands the oversight that the legislature has. And, of course, our oversight is distributing funds. that's what we do and if we're going to distribute funds to libraries that have a policy that we will not withhold any information books materials or other from anyone regardless of their age and if our state library board and our state library the county libraries and regional libraries if they can't develop a policy that says that we've got a big problem as many of you know I had a bill, Senate Bill 184, that would remove the State Library Board and the AETN Board. When I met with the AETN folks, they said, yeah, we've got a problem, and we're going to work with you to resolve it. And they have, and they did. And I've stricken the removal of their board from that language. I was hoping that the State Library Board would say, yeah, we can do a little bit better. We can develop a written policy. That's who we are, policy folks. We can develop a written policy and put it down in front of people so people can see how we make a decision. Recently, there was a court case, a federal court weighed in on Act 372, I think it was, and the court laid down guidance. We can't discriminate, one can't and shouldn't discriminate on point of view. However, one can relocate and a library can relocate sexually explicit material out of where children can't reach it. Now, the court didn't lay that down exactly how to do that, but they said it's appropriate to take sexually explicit material and move it out of the reach of children. Our state library board voted against that. We don't want to have policy that does that. And again, folks, we're policy people. If it's not written down, then it is not policy. In fact, the court said that librarians are the single determiner of what's appropriate. If that's true, then write it down. Just let us see what that means at your local library. What is your local library doing to protect children? And if they're doing that, fine, write it down. If you're not doing it, write it down. We're policy folks. I'll be glad that... Oh, last thing. The question was asked, why am I running this in special language? One reason is because special language has a year and it terminates. So at the end of, I think, July or June 30th, however many days June has in it, this bill is gone. and it would have to come up again and be promulgated again. That's one reason. The second reason is I wanted to kind of segregate this from another bill that will be pending about the library board. If this bill fails today, I still have the option of running legislation that does pretty much what this does. So I appreciate the opportunity and ask for a good vote. I'd be glad to take any questions, Mr. Chair. Members, are there
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Lee Johnson Chair Unverified 17:41
any questions for the senator? Senator Tucker, you're recognized. Thank you, Mr. Chair. So
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Clarke Tucker Unverified 17:46
I'm reading this for the first time, Senator. I just have a couple questions. One is on page 2, which is page 27 of the entire packet. I'm looking at page 2 of the bill. Yes, sir. Yeah, 2 of 3. The special language bill. Okay. Great. All right. Down at 3A, about halfway through the page. I don't have that on mine. Can you read that? Tell me what it says. Yes, sir. It says, if the Arkansas State Library has budgeted, allocated, or expended any funding to a library described in subsection B of this section, the full amount of funding for the current fiscal year for the library shall be returned to the Arkansas State Library as appropriated in this act upon notification by the Arkansas State Library. So is that retroactive such that if a library has received, I'm just making a number up, $50,000 from July 1st of 2024 through today's date, then they have to return that $50,000 that they've collected over the last nine and a half months to the Arkansas State Library? Yes. So the reason we're doing that, they're
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified 19:03
paid quarterly. So the money is distributed quarterly and if someone develops the policy as described and they say, I've met the criteria and we are no longer affiliated and they go six months and they say nobody's watching, we're going to now affiliate back with them. We're going to go to the national conference, our regional conference. So if you do that, you're going to repay the amount of money. I think that's fair. I mean, somebody the other day, I was running a bill, and I asked one of my colleagues, I think here, that I gave him something to read and said, are you going to read it, or are you just going to trust me? And people around him said, read the bill. I understand. That's what we do. We're policy. So I expect people, when they say we're going to disaffiliate, that's what they do. Keep your word. If you're going to take
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Clarke Tucker Unverified 20:00
our money, keep your word. Yeah, I guess my question, I understand your position. My question is a little bit different in that if this were to pass, this policy has not been on the books until today, right? And so if someone has been collecting money from the state library for the last nine and a half months of this current fiscal year, even when this policy was not in place, will they
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified 20:23
have to return that money? Yeah, I think the last line says these provisions shall be in effect until only from July 1st. So it's not effective right now. So if you're taking money, I'd say get all you can get
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Clarke Tucker Unverified 20:38
right now. Okay. Okay, fair enough. All right. On page one of the bill under B2, it makes a reference to official documents. I'm just curious about what that means. Yeah, mostly it refers to policy. You know, our libraries, I think,
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified 20:59
all have a policy book that they operate from. And many of our libraries in the state have the American Library Association in their policy in different forms. One saying that we'll abide by American Library Association Bill of Rights that says we'll not withhold any material from anyone, regardless of their age. And when I ask librarians about that, they say, we don't do that. And my response is, okay, take it out of your policy. They don't do that either. So how can you have a policy that you don't follow?
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Lee Johnson Chair Unverified 21:38
Senator Tucker, we do have several people in the queue. If you don't mind, I'm going to move on to
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Jimmy Hickey, Jr Unverified 21:45
the next person. Yes. Senator Hickey, you're recognized. Thank you. Senator Tucker pretty much got what the one I was going to ask about was that makes reference to American Library Association and any library policies or official documents. I mean, that just seems so broad to me. You know, if, I mean, I guess, let's just say the board, you know, tried to try to adopt a policy that says that you know we're not going to make reference to the American Library Association then does that contradict what's in the bill because that's an official document it just uh I think I know what you're trying to do there but it seems so broad to me I'm not for sure that it couldn't be counterintuitive on that on that somehow
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified 22:35
uh well i understand i think every just like a the our body every document that we pass as a body is an official document so if a document goes through the local board it becomes an official document it wouldn't include you know the people sending texts to each other or talking uh you know it would just include it's if it's again if it's official a board has approved it that's and that's my point
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Jimmy Hickey, Jr Unverified 23:03
let's just say that that one of these boards actually after if this were to pass were to were to go in and say say we can might not make reference to the american library association and present that to their board you know because this statute has passed then they've made a reference to the American Library Association in an official document I mean it's I mean it may sound far-fetched but it's it says that if they make a reference to them then basically they're in they're in violation it doesn't say a negative reference or a positive reference or anything to that nature if they just make any type of reference
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified 23:50
I see your point. And again, it's not the intent. I understand. Um, but you know, that's, uh, I'll leave
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Lee Johnson Chair Unverified 24:01
it at that. Thank you, Senator. So Senator Gilmore, you are
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Ben Gilmore Unverified 24:04
recognized for a question. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you, Senator. I just trying to work through how this will work in my mind. So I just have a couple of questions here. So, uh, because I don't know, can you, can you tell me, uh, in regards to the American library association, what that means to library in the sense of why, why do they have an affiliation or membership or what, what is the benefit of having a membership
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Clarke Tucker Unverified 24:27
or do you know? I think every library would answer that differently. Okay. Um,
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified 24:32
the way as a policy to analyze their policy, they, you would be a member if you agree with their policy. And unfortunately we have libraries that say they disagree with the policy, but they won't remove the policy so i've again just to answer your question i guess my assumption would be they agree with the policy yeah and i guess my question
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Ben Gilmore Unverified 24:55
was more in lines and maybe i didn't do a good job of asking it more in lines of is there any sort of certifications or or anything like that that goes in line with being affiliated with this national group so i know a lot of professions get certifications or or something related to being a part of a national affiliation and I don't know because why I'm asking do you are you aware of I'm not aware that would jeopardize any sort of anything related
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Clarke Tucker Unverified 25:22
to libraries you know I have not had any library including the state librarian or other librarians
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified 25:30
I talked to say there's anything at risk if they disassociate with the American Library
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Clarke Tucker Unverified 25:45
Association okay thank you senator senator Clark you recognize again. Thank you, Dr. Lee. So on line, just one question, one other question. This is on the first page under 3A, except as provided under subdivision B3B of this section makes payments or grants of any kind to the ALA. So I'm assuming this is your intent. I just want to make sure I'm understanding it properly not only can they not spend state dollars on an ALA membership they can't spend any money they get from a municipality a county or that they raise privately get from a foundation a grant any any any revenue that they generate whether it's from the state or
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified 26:24
otherwise that's correct okay I mean the again the purpose of that is I think the ALA as many of these national groups do they don't align with priorities and policy of the state of Arkansas If you're promoting boys and girls sports or boys and girls bathrooms and all those kinds of things, if that's what you're doing, that does not align with policy of Arkansas. Agree or disagree, it's not our policy. It's also a violation of federal policy now in many instances to promote DEI, which they do. You can find that clearly in many places that they support DEI. I think that violates federal law. I think it violates, again, when you look at the definition of DEI in access, for example, or other places, it clearly says what DEI is. The American Library Association says we are promoters of DEI. That's what we're going to do. That is not aligned with policy in Arkansas. And I don't think libraries should be, they're under our oversight. I don't think they should be spending a nickel to promote policy that violates arkansas policy right i just was wanting
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Clarke Tucker Unverified 27:35
to understand that this proposes to restrict more than just their state funding so correct thank you yeah
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Lee Johnson Chair Unverified 27:42
members are there any other questions for
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Jonathan Dismang Unverified 27:51
senator sullivan senator dismayne you recognize let me press your mic briefly before thank you mr chairman and this is the the term affiliation because i'm not sure what that means or how expansive it's going to be We clean it up a little bit when you go to page B. So I guess an affiliation, I mean, page B, page 2 or 27, section B, where we say that, I mean, I guess an affiliation isn't if you go to a conference led by the ALA, so long as it's, you know, a conference that's not in conflict with state law. But that, I mean, I understand the membership that's easy to, you know, to decipher. That's not a hard thing to know whether or not you're paying for a membership or not. I'm not sure how you could get to go to a conference without paying for a membership as part of a group, but maybe there's a way. But that word affiliation, I don't know if it needs to be defined or how expansive that is for what that's going to mean when we're asking the library board and ultimately the state library to withhold funds or give funds. I think ultimately we're talking about five point eight million dollars and my whole time in this process when I'm communicating with, you know, libraries back home is, you know, if the library board were to be abolished, we're not going to jeopardize your funding if, you know, those sorts of things. And now we're kind of entering into the funding discussion and creating some new parameters that that's
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified 29:13
my concern. Yeah, I wish the libraries were as concerned as you. I mean, they have an obligation, as if we have oversight, they have an obligation to call and work with you and work with me. They haven't taken that opportunity on this to reach out. And if their funding is, and it is, at risk, then they need to reach out. And again, when I look at working with the AETN, they did that. And we found some common ground. librarians have not done that therefore their funding is at risk did i answer your question well
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Jonathan Dismang Unverified 29:52
my local libraries have reached out and they've expressed concerns and so i'm relaying them to you i don't think they're doing anything that's contrary to most of what's this bill but they're also being they're concerned about technicalities and being tripped up and making sure language is appropriately written so that there's not a unforeseen problem for even the libraries that you maybe agree you agree with on policy so the blanket that this is happening everywhere is is not you know I've watched you know unfortunately the three hours worth of testimony last time on the state library board I understand some of the concerns you have based on some of the things I heard during that meeting but again we have we do have local libraries that are concerned that maybe that the way that this is written unintentionally could impact their share of the the money that the
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified 30:44
state allocates understood you know when the court ruling came down i've got it right here on senate bill 372 the judge had many things that appropriateness we need to clear that up yeah but four or five terms he said we needed to clean up however when we look at state library policy they use those very same terms so you know i think it's my experience is every time we try to define it further people still have questions and we never get to the bottom of what's clear to anybody and i completely
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Jonathan Dismang Unverified 31:21
understand what you're saying and on that particular issue you and i are in a line i don't believe that sexually explicit materials should be made available to minors or readily available to minors i we agree on that that is not what this bill does that's cut and dry for me i understand that issue i don't have the in-depth knowledge of what all is utilized by libraries for the ALA I mean obviously there are some good things or we wouldn't have carved out an exception for them to be able to attend meetings that are not in conflict with state law so it is this way this piece of legislation that has to do with the ALA and some of the terminology that I don't understand well enough the other is easy this is not as clearly defined to me so it's a harder thing for me to understand and ultimately I think also a harder thing for my libraries back home that have concerns about the language and all i'm asking is like it feels like there's a potential that some people could get tripped up unintentionally even outside of the concerns that you have based on this language but the sexually explicit we're on the we're rowing in the same
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified 32:25
direction well um i don't know that we are if libraries have in their policy that we adhere to the american library association policy the american library association policy disagrees with what we've just said so if your library has that in their policy and i don't know but many many of them do uh and again i don't know that we if the if we're hung up over the word uh what's the word affiliation uh what that what affiliation means yeah i think it's pretty straightforward and I just about I don't know that's the case but I think that's likely referred to in other legislation. Is that what you're asking me to do is clear up what affiliation means? I'm saying that I think to me even a reading
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Jonathan Dismang Unverified 33:18
I think I mean I don't think any member could read this language and understand what the outcome is ultimately. I may be wrong but I don't think anyone could just straightforward and just understand what the implications of this legislation are. I am saying that because of, I mean, that gives me concern, right? I mean, you may have libraries doing everything the way that you think they should be doing it that could be tripped up by the way that this is written and lose their state funding.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified 33:54
Again, not we well let me respond this way I've not had any libraries reach out to me saying this language is too vague and we're going to lose our state funding based on ABC they've not done that the AETN did that they sat down with their bylaws we said this is what it means they've not done it with me members are there any other questions for senator sullivan seeing no other
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Lee Johnson Chair Unverified 34:22
questions do we have a motion to adopt the amendment motion do we have a second second all those in favor say aye opposed your bill your motion your amendment has failed thank you mr. sullivan appreciate you uh representative garner you're up next this is item d8 on pages 31 through 33 of your packet and you are recognized to
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Denise Garner Unverified 34:59
present your amendment. Thank you Mr. Chair. Colleagues, this came out of the maternal health working group and we are sending money to pregnancy resources that are not are not regulated so we don't really know what they're doing and many of them do lots of good things and we want i just would like to know what they're using the grant money that they're they're getting from the state for so that we can figure out where the gaps are in the rest of the state many of the rural areas we've got 50 of our counties that don't have um don't have maternal health care and so these some of these may fill the gap for some of the resources needed for these women and I'm just trying to figure out um what they're using the money for and how we can fill those gaps if if the communities have them members are there
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Lee Johnson Chair Unverified 35:52
any questions for representative garner seeing none do we have a motion to adopt the amendment motion do we have a second second all those in favor say aye opposed it's passed thank you members seeing no other business we're gonna before we adjourn we're gonna release let's see at the request of the members we're gonna release house bill the amendment item number three c3 house bill 1389 house bill 1577 item number four the amendment by representative Crawford and house bill 1635 the amendment by representative McCullough we're gonna release all of of those back to joint budget. Is there any other business for the committee? Seeing none, this meeting is adjourned.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error

Agenda

A. Call to Order.

2:40
▶ Play chapter

B. Comments by Co-Chairs.

2:42
▶ Play chapter

C. Bills referred to the Special Language Subcommittee:

D. Amendments referred to the Special Language Subcommittee:

4:23
▶ Play chapter

E. Other Business.

36:12
▶ Play chapter

F. Adjournment.

Speakers

Speaker 1
2 segments
Speaker 4
5 segments
Representative Lee Johnson Chair Unverified
26 segments
Representative Andrew Collins Unverified
7 segments
Senator Jimmy Hickey, Jr Unverified
8 segments
Speaker 34
2 segments
Senator Dan Sullivan Unverified
43 segments
Senator Clarke Tucker Unverified
16 segments
Senator Ben Gilmore Unverified
4 segments
Senator Jonathan Dismang Unverified
12 segments
Representative Denise Garner Unverified
3 segments