Said in CommitteeBeta

Exactly as spoken.

Representative John W. Walker

Speaker names can be wrong. Names are identified automatically through voice matching and may contain errors. Always verify speaker attribution against the video before citing it.

Committees

No committee participation found.

Recent Meetings

Date Committee Speaking Time
March 19, 2013 — 267s
March 15, 2013 — 362s
March 14, 2013 — 665s
March 13, 2013 — 818s
March 13, 2013 — 835s
March 12, 2013 — 771s
March 11, 2013 — 32s
March 8, 2013 — 95s
March 8, 2013 — 199s
March 7, 2013 — 308s
March 5, 2013 — 74s
March 5, 2013 — 741s
March 1, 2013 — 77s
March 1, 2013 — 225s
Feb. 28, 2013 — 442s
Feb. 27, 2013 — 529s
Feb. 26, 2013 — 651s
Feb. 25, 2013 — 580s
Feb. 22, 2013 — 61s
Feb. 22, 2013 — 249s
Feb. 20, 2013 — 314s
Feb. 19, 2013 — 284s
Feb. 18, 2013 — 40s
Feb. 14, 2013 — 590s
Feb. 13, 2013 — 47s
Feb. 12, 2013 — 211s
Jan. 17, 2013 — 7s
April 1, 2011 — 52s
April 1, 2011 — 126s
March 31, 2011 — 412s
March 30, 2011 — 411s
March 30, 2011 — 1151s
March 29, 2011 — 132s
March 29, 2011 — 380s
March 29, 2011 — 66s
March 29, 2011 — 356s
March 29, 2011 — 37s
March 29, 2011 — 449s
March 29, 2011 — 509s
March 29, 2011 — 6s
March 25, 2011 — 45s
March 25, 2011 — 10s
March 24, 2011 — 79s
March 24, 2011 — 331s
March 24, 2011 — 644s
March 23, 2011 — 10s
March 23, 2011 — 162s
March 23, 2011 — 1448s
March 22, 2011 — 362s
March 22, 2011 — 995s

Recent Transcript Excerpts

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (43:15)

It's the difference between a volunteer. And if they're volunteering, that's one thing. Absolutely. If it's employment, then it would seem as if wage and hour laws ought to have some applicability. Representative Walker,

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (43:10)

matter. But my question is, if they're employees, shouldn't they be paid rather than volunteers?

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (42:19)

also backs that up. Let me ask then. Is there anything that regulates what the camps may pay to workers? Or may they pay them anything they want to? Assuming that we

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (42:38)

be either not paid, paid 50 cents an hour, a dollar an hour, or two dollars an hour?

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (41:53)

glad to take them. Representative Walker, for what purpose? A question you recognize. What does this do? Does this mean that people can work in organized camps and religious nonprofit educational conference centers without those centers having to adhere to the minimum wage laws? That's correct. There

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (37:08)

state. Well, question, Mr. Speaker. Well, I'm trying to understand how the state benefits if you, in effect, saying to somebody, you come here and you do business in our state, and you can make as much money as you want to, but you don't have to pay but X dollars. Isn't that against capitalistic principles?

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (36:28)

and make $100 million or more, but then it pays no more taxes than what you have

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (36:16)

purpose? You recognize? Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Now, let me understand this. A captive insurance company in Arkansas, so defiant, may be a hugely successful business

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (28:27)

does not give them double dipping? Oh, no, not at all. Thank you. Representative Gossage has explained the bill.

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (27:33)

And then if they happen not to remain as resource officers, what happens to them then when they go back to being just normal

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (27:20)

invoice the school district for the money. Further question, Mr. Speaker, do you recognize? They are eligible, are they not, to participate in either the municipal police retirement system or the county retirement system?

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (26:27)

Representative Walker, for a purpose. Question you recognize. Are these resource officers employees of the school district or are they employees of the local police force who ascend to the school district? That's a great question, Mr. Walker, and

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (12:54)

And that makes no sense. I mean, the idea cannot go forth from this chamber that the right to bear arms is a right to bear arms against this government. Representative Walker

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (12:14)

Mr. Speaker, fellow members of the House, I fear that this legislation does nothing other than afford people the opportunity. If they don't like the government at the time, be it Governor Beebe or some other governor, Governor Hutchinson possibly, and there is an emergency and the National Guard is called out, a person may be able to keep his gun in

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (12:46)

the face of a declaration that he can't in order to bear arms against the government.

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (10:35)

the big bucks for. Well, isn't that the governor's prerogative, to try to protect the people of the state through the use of the National Guard and the state militia and to try to

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (10:46)

deal with the general common good rather than a particular individual right that

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (10:19)

Second question, Mr. Carter. Mr. Speaker, how is one to determine whether someone is misusing a firearm during a time of emergency?

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (9:17)

or while people are otherwise in distress and the very nature of their living is at stake, the governor does not have power to send out the National Guard or to otherwise cause the police to repress and suppress the possibility of people using their

Meeting — March 19, 2013 (9:03)

question. Is it your position that during a Katrina, Hurricane Sandy-type situation, the so-called right to bear arms or to have a weapon while one is floating down the river

Bills Discussed

No bills found.

← Back to all legislators