Said in CommitteeBeta

Exactly as spoken.

Representative Jim Nickels

Speaker names can be wrong. Names are identified automatically through voice matching and may contain errors. Always verify speaker attribution against the video before citing it.

Committees

No committee participation found.

Recent Meetings

Date Committee Speaking Time
March 15, 2013 — 165s
March 14, 2013 — 130s
March 14, 2013 — 19s
March 13, 2013 — 164s
March 13, 2013 — 254s
March 12, 2013 — 9s
March 8, 2013 — 215s
March 8, 2013 — 79s
March 7, 2013 — 189s
March 6, 2013 — 160s
March 5, 2013 — 172s
March 1, 2013 — 196s
Feb. 28, 2013 — 539s
Feb. 27, 2013 — 63s
Feb. 26, 2013 — 99s
Feb. 22, 2013 — 77s
Feb. 22, 2013 — 39s
Feb. 21, 2013 — 93s
Feb. 19, 2013 — 150s
Feb. 18, 2013 — 75s
Feb. 14, 2013 — 71s
Feb. 14, 2013 — 209s
Feb. 14, 2013 — 722s
Feb. 13, 2013 — 96s
Feb. 13, 2013 — 88s
Feb. 12, 2013 — 6s
Feb. 8, 2013 — 227s
Feb. 6, 2013 — 100s
Feb. 4, 2013 — 37s
Feb. 1, 2013 — 3s
Jan. 31, 2013 — 3s
Jan. 30, 2013 — 2s
Jan. 30, 2013 — 170s
Jan. 29, 2013 — 45s
Jan. 17, 2013 — 25s
Feb. 27, 2012 — 61s
Feb. 15, 2012 — 67s
April 11, 2011 — 53s
April 1, 2011 — 483s
April 1, 2011 — 27s
March 31, 2011 — 13s
March 31, 2011 — 152s
March 31, 2011 — 46s
March 31, 2011 — 31s
March 31, 2011 — 79s
March 30, 2011 — 51s
March 29, 2011 — 224s
March 29, 2011 — 144s
March 29, 2011 — 304s
March 29, 2011 — 140s

Recent Transcript Excerpts

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (53:58)

in mind... What does the Scripture say about suing folks? Well,

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (53:07)

but I'm afraid if we just use anecdotal information or one incident to blanket all churches with immunity, it causes me a little bit of concern. May I respond to that? May I respond to that?

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (52:53)

community and open up their place to vote. Of course, I don't know much about the facts as you just related them, but it sounds like an outcome that I would not have expected,

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (50:57)

comfort level I just don't see a legal reason for having this mr. hammer can you give us a little bit more background on this one incident you're you have I'll be

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (50:27)

find those accessible polling sites now when you are the election officials that are conducting the election I assume that they have an immunity based upon their their their public entities is that correct right so if if churches have not waived their charitable immunity and the people conducting the elections have immunity other than

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (48:46)

Nichols Mr. Hammer you mentioned a particular incident that caused you to come up with this bill can you did that church had they waived their charitable immunity by opening up a polling their their church to as a polling location I mean, a church would have charitable immunity.

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (37:09)

find as interesting the representative Bell but you know if this I guess if we pass it we

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (36:48)

based upon the prices you've obtained from Lowe's I

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (36:41)

zoning district we can certainly have that debate but so now you want us to legislate on the height of the fence

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (35:54)

fence heights would interest somebody from MENA well

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (35:46)

running the bill about the capital zoning district I mean I guess I'm just a little confused about why

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (35:40)

any questions and a good vote represent Nichols why is a representative from Mena Arkansas

Meeting — March 15, 2013 (17:06)

approval has to form now and some of the materials I think that we received from the Secretary of State or Ethics Commission it has forms in that book for certain candidates to utilize that as a Secretary of State will be developing comparable forms that the candidates can

Meeting — Feb. 8, 2013 (35:34)

I'm sure that the lawyers for the state of Arkansas will argue sovereign immunity unless there's some strong language in the statute itself that waives that. And I haven't seen that. So, Mr. Bell,

Meeting — Feb. 8, 2013 (36:07)

represent much that you recognize for

Meeting — Feb. 8, 2013 (35:10)

to court. Okay. Well, that's just a concern I have about the statute. I like the statute. I think it's something we need, but I don't want to see it knocked out on the constitutional grounds because of sovereign immunity, and I'm afraid that if the state gets hit with a 10% award that is extremely high,

Meeting — Feb. 8, 2013 (34:38)

waive sovereign immunity. Would you agree?

Meeting — Feb. 8, 2013 (34:22)

they called it Chancery Court, and I just have always wondered how, and I don't recall the statute itself trying to waive sovereign immunity, and since sovereign immunity is part of our Constitution, it's pretty hard to

Meeting — Feb. 8, 2013 (34:16)

I believe, did give a cause of action, and I think at that time

Meeting — Feb. 8, 2013 (34:05)

but I think the the act itself though my recollection of it I think it was passed in the early 90s,

Bills Discussed

No bills found.

← Back to all legislators