Said in CommitteeBeta

Exactly as spoken.

ALC-Occupational Licensing Review Subcommittee

January 15, 2026 ·1:30 PM ·Room A, MAC ·19:05
Video Transcript 3 documents

Transcript

Transcript available SliQ live captions ✓ Whisper ✓ Download .txt
Machine transcript

May contain errors. Verify important quotations against the official video.

About transcript accuracy
Source
Whisper
Model
ggml-large-v3-turbo.bin
Processing date
October 5, 2026
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 0:00
Just a minute or two. All right, everybody. I've got 1.30, So we'll go ahead and get started. I'll call the meeting to order. So welcome, everyone, to the first Occupational Licensing Review Committee, subcommittee for 2026. If you would, please keep Senator Wallace in your thoughts and prayers. He's a little under the weather, so he wasn't able to join us today. To get down to business here, the first thing we need to do is have a review of the reports from the two that we're going to be doing today. We've got the Arkansas State Board of Nursing and the State Board of Register, if I can read correctly, the State Board of Registration for Professional Soil Classifier. So we've got two interesting groups today. So we'll go ahead and get started with the Arkansas State Board of Nursing. If you all would come forward, we're scheduled to have Ashley Davis, David Dawson, and Matt Gilmore. all right thank you all for being here this afternoon if you would when you get settled please introduce yourselves to the committee and then you're welcome to make any opening statements you might
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 9 1:51
have matt gilmore department health ashley davis director
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 10 1:55
arkansas state board nursing david dawson general counsel for the board
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 1:58
of nursing okay all right and then began any opening comments you'd like to make on the state of the licensing
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Matt Gilmore Unverified 2:04
well thank you for your time this afternoon um you just heard the director and her general counsel introduce themselves they'll just make a few opening statements and comments about the board and their licensure process we'll take any questions y'all have thank
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 11 2:21
you well go ahead this is just an update on where we are The Board of Nursing was created in 1913 with the purpose of oversight for registered nurses. In 1948, we added the regulation of LPNs, and in 1995, we added advanced practice registered nurses. Currently, the board regulates 72,000 nurses. There are eight types of nursing licenses, one level of certification that began in 2005, and one level of registration that will begin in 2026. The protection of the public occurs through the licensure of qualified nurses, setting standards for nursing education programs, setting standards for maintaining competency, and disciplining nurses for violations of the Nurse Practice Act. All states in the United States license all levels of nursing. RNs and LPNs are required to pass a standard national licensure exam in order to be licensed, and advanced practice registered nurses are required to obtain national certification in their area of specialty. The LPNs in Arkansas receive a certification of graduation. Their program length is about one year, and currently there are 14,000 actively licensed LPNs in the state of Arkansas. Registered nurses received associate degrees or bachelor's degrees, and there are currently 49,000 registered nurses actively licensed in Arkansas. Advanced practice registered nurses receive a master's degree or a doctorate degree, and we currently have 8,000 actively licensed advanced practice nurses in Arkansas. That's made up of certified nurse practitioners, which we have 6,700 of those, CRNAs, which we have about 1,100, clinical nurse specialists, which we have about 140, and certified nurse midwives, which we have around 60 actively licensed in Arkansas. Medication assistants are required to be a CNA first, and then they must complete a 115-hour course. Their role is to administer medications in long-term care facilities, and currently we have 820 MACs in Arkansas. We are in the process of launching a registry for dialysis patient care technicians. National data suggests that that number may closely mirror that of the MACs as far as how many we may have in Arkansas. They are required to currently be employed as dialysis techs, have completed or be enrolled in a training course, and they must obtain national certification within 18 months. The board provides regulatory oversight by receiving and investigating complaints against nurses and MACs, and the board receives approximately 2,200 complaints a year. And that's my update, but I'm happy to take questions. Okay, we've got
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 5:08
a few. Just to make sure I understand, you were saying on the CNA and the dialysis, were you saying max, as in we can only have so many
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 24 5:16
of those, or was I misunderstanding that? I'm sorry. Medication assistant certified, so MAC max. Max, okay. I was
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 5:22
thinking that just seemed kind of weird that we would have a maximum number of CNAs that we can't have in the state. With that in mind, I know in the past Arkansas has faced shortages of nurses in the past. How are we doing right now in the profession as far as having enough to provide for the
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 11 5:40
needs of our citizens? That's a very complex question because if you were to look at our number of licensed nurses, we do have enough to fill the needs. However, we have shortages in certain areas, and we have a lot of actively licensed nurses who are not practicing as nurses right now. So I would say we have a vacancy issue more so than a lack of licensed nurses, but that's a complex problem that there's lots of people. The Arkansas Center for Nursing, which is our workforce center, they spend a lot of time looking at
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 6:12
that balance. Okay, so there's room for more, it sounds like. Yeah, absolutely. The next question that I have is, it looked like you said there's about 2,000 complaints in the state based upon nurses. Obviously, we can't go into any one particular case, but could you give us an idea of generally what you're seeing with those complaints? What kind of complaints are we seeing? What tends to be the most typical ones that we
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 11 6:36
see? I do actually have some numbers from the previous fiscal year. Some of our highest complaints that we work are nurses who apply to become nurses but have positive criminal backgrounds. We do some investigation into that. Fraud, deception, and misrepresentation is another big one. But I would say misappropriation, drug abuse issues, and criminal investigations are also a very high number. Okay. And then the last question I have,
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 7:05
and then I'll see if any of my colleagues have any. Right now, it looks like you're spending about $4 million a year, have about an $8.5 million fund balance. Of course, the law is three years, so not quite there, but you're kind of getting into that area. I also notice it says you don't really do any kind of training program or outreach. Is there any opportunities to do that to try to help promote nursing in some of those rural areas that we could use some of that fund balance for? Do you all look at that, or is that out of your purview for how we could utilize that extra money?
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 23 7:43
I think that we have – do you
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 11 7:45
want to speak to that? I think that we have a lot of work with our nursing associations in doing that, and so we support them in doing that. And some areas that we are looking at is with our nurses in our alternative to discipline program. We require them to go to support groups, and we're looking at ways that we might could help them pay for the cost of that, particularly if it's a nurse-led support group. So we are kind of looking at different ways.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 19 8:12
And I might just add, Director Davis and her staff do go around the state,
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Matt Gilmore Unverified 8:18
work with the schools, and try to provide some guidance, and some that are struggling in different categories of their licensure or accreditation, so they support that
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 8:27
as well. So it's multifaceted. Do you all do anything with concurrent credits in high schools to try to help with that career path, try to
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 11 8:37
promote that, any? We do not necessarily work with them one-on-one, But the Arkansas Center for Nursing, which is our workforce center, we do give them a grant to do some of that outreach and try to get our numbers of actively working nurses higher.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 8:52
And so they do engage in that. Okay, excellent, excellent. Okay. Representative Bentley, you are up. Thank you, Chairman. Thank
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Mary Bentley Unverified 9:00
you all for being here today. And I was just a tad bit late getting back here so you may have covered this. But with the high volume that we have of complaints and nurses that have to be investigated, and from what I understand, it's been taken up to two years sometimes to get to those cases completed. Do we need to relook at that system and maybe add more staff or something to get to where it's quicker than the two-year turnaround time, or am I wrong when I was told it takes up to two years sometimes to get these cases completed? You're not
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 11 9:30
wrong in that there is opportunities for us to be more efficient, and that's been one of my number one things that I have done since I have taken the role is to look for those opportunities. Some of the things that I've identified is more about how we are documenting that. So, for instance, we have nurses who have been charged criminally, and so we open a case when that happens. But they may not have adjudication of that criminal charge for two years, three years, And so that case is remaining open on our books while we wait for the criminal system to make an adjudication on that case. And so we're looking at ways that we can identify that to where it doesn't count on our open case time necessarily. So there's other opportunities like that for better documentation on what exactly is going on with the case so that it doesn't appear as if all cases take that. I will say that I did, I ran some numbers, and our average length is 191 days. And that includes those cases that take years because we're waiting on that criminal adjudication. But we are working on processes. We have, with the help of the Department of Health, have added some extra help positions to hopefully increase that efficiency. But that is one of my number one priorities, yes. Great. Thank you for that. So
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Mary Bentley Unverified 10:48
I think that's all the questions I have for now. Thank you, Chairman. okay
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 5 10:55
all right anybody else going once going twice okay all right saying
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 11:00
done thank you all for for being here without objection well that report will stand as reviewed second on our agenda for today we have the professional soil classifiers so we have our gentleman from the Department of
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 38 11:12
Agriculture and once you get settled in
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 11:31
if you would please introduce yourselves to the committee and then you'll be recognized to make any
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 41 11:39
opening comments chris call closure director of the natural Resources Division at the
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 43 11:46
Arkansas Department of Agriculture. Matthew Ford, Chief Legal Counsel for the Arkansas
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 41 11:53
Department of Agriculture. Okay, all right. All right, good afternoon, members. What you have before you is the occupational license for the soil classifiers. Soil classifiers were established by the state in 1975, and that has been administered by the Arkansas State Board of registration for professional soil classifiers that board was later abolished in 2023 and moved to the natural resources commission which is where it's housed right now it's a very small group of individuals a very niche profession in that it has to be focused on being extremely knowledgeable when it comes to soils the requirements to be a soil classifier is that you have to have a four year degree and that you have to have a certain number of hours in biological sciences earth sciences and soils classes and so those professions across the state typically are going to be folks that design septic systems do wetland determination they can do nutrient management work but obviously very skilled and very knowledgeable when it comes to soils i think we have 29 right now that are registered in the state of arkansas again very niche if you look at other states the numbers tend to be relatively low like that because it is a niche profession so with that be happy to take
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 13:12
any questions so kind of like the last question is 29 enough to handle the the need in
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 48 13:19
the state i mean right now we don't have we don't seem to have a shortage of workers
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 41 13:26
that can do the work I mean, obviously, things can change if you have a boom in, you know, nutrient management, for example, things like that, those sorts of needs, then, yeah, I think you would see a need to increase it. But right now, we're not seeing any major issues with the number that we have.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 13:46
Okay. And then the only other question that I have, it's not necessarily a red flag, but it looks like 29 individuals, you're collecting $600 a year. It looks like you have $20,000 in reserves and, of course, the law three-year fund balance. So, 600 times three would be $1,800. So, obviously, we're 10x that. Now, I understand we're not talking a whole lot of money here, but I'm just wondering, it looks like you use some of it to pay cybersecurity expenses. But I'm just curious, what can we do with that $20,000 to make sure we're in compliance and be productive, you know, whether it's for educational or I'm just kind of curious
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 41 14:27
your thoughts on that. Yeah, I mean, there's some expenses that could have been charged over there since it was moved to us in 23. We had some savings in some other areas that we used to assist with this program. If you think about the program itself, it's not super expensive. I mean, we print certificates, so there's ink, there's paper, there's some staff time. We have a very small appropriation, and it's an M&O appropriation. We're looking to maybe expand that so that we can encompass some of the expense related to salaries to administer the program. But there's also some training opportunities that we can do with the association. We've also talked to them about potentially looking at upgrading the test and some of the curriculum. So I think we won't have any problems. Some opportunities there.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 15:13
Yes, sir. Okay, excellent. All right, Representative McGrew, you're up, sir.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Richard McGrew Unverified 15:18
Thank you, Chairman. And thank you all, gentlemen, for being here. and I'm going to show my ignorance a little bit today, but I've never heard of this classification before as a soil classifier. Can you give me an indication of what would be involved in the job of that and what the demand is for this? Yeah, so
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 41 15:37
it's going to be those things where you have to classify the soils. And so in most cases, probably the most common is going to be for septic tanks. and so we have a list of those providers on our web page and if folks want to go to them or they can go to potentially somebody with the health department, a lot of times they'll go to a soil classifier and they can assist with laying out that septic tank and that design and making sure that it's going to perk and those
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 59 16:08
sorts of things. Follow-up. So you're talking about a perk test?
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 16:13
Yes, sir. That's part of it. Thank you.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Jane English Unverified 16:19
Okay. Senator English, you're next. so what kind of um obviously somebody's going to have to have a college degree yes so what kind of degrees would people get to come into this yeah
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 41 16:32
mostly going to be in the biology earth science physical science so you think about the geology degrees biology degrees and then you have to have I think 15 hours of soils classes so you have to have 30 hours in the biological physical sciences and then 15 hours and in college yes before you take the curriculum that the natural resources has
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Jane English Unverified 16:51
yes yeah thank you yep okay all right representative per year
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 56 17:00
you're up sir thank you chair so representative
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 64 17:02
McGrew brought up that where someone asked a question makes you
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Chad Puryear Unverified 17:06
think of a question so i apologize for that but what you mentioned the like the designated representative in the septic world what can what can the what can these guys do that a dr could not do i mean would these guys supersede a dr's decision when they say a place wouldn't perk or just kind of elaborate on the differences
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 41 17:25
of the two i don't know that i can answer that completely as far as the comparison between the two all i know is that if you're going to classify soils in the state of arkansas you need to be a soil classifier and these folks obviously have extensive knowledge of soils and so i don't know what the difference would be but typically these folks are going to be can be on construction sites when you're looking at you know complex soils if you're building something or establishing foundations wetland determination but really anything dealing with soils i hope i answered that i
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 50 17:57
may not have done a good job i could get in the
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 68 18:02
weeds on that but we'll yeah i appreciate you yeah done asking questions yeah so if someone
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 18:10
was going to come build a new you know multi-acre warehouse complex or walmart was just finished building their new giant headquarters up there these folks would probably be employed to make sure that the foundations and so
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 48 18:23
forth was all so if if they had if they needed to classify the soils there then they would get a soil classifier
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 41 18:31
every project may not require
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 69 18:34
that right All right. Anything else? Any other questions, colleagues? All right. Seeing none, gentlemen,
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified 18:40
thank you for your time this afternoon. Without objection, the report will stand reviewed. That's the only thing we have on the agenda this afternoon. Our next meeting will be on February 19th, 1.30 in this same room. Have a good afternoon, everyone. Thank you.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error

Agenda

A. Call to Order

0:34

B. Comments by the Co-Chairs

0:37

C. Review of Reports from Occupational Authorization Entities:

1:00

D. Other Business

18:47

E. Adjournment

18:55

Speakers

Representative Stephen Meeks Unverified
28 segments
Speaker 9
1 segment
Speaker 10
1 segment
Matt Gilmore Unverified
3 segments
Speaker 11
15 segments
Speaker 24
1 segment
Speaker 23
1 segment
Speaker 19
1 segment
Representative Mary Bentley Unverified
3 segments
Speaker 5
1 segment
Speaker 38
1 segment
Speaker 41
14 segments
Speaker 43
1 segment
Speaker 48
2 segments
Representative Richard McGrew Unverified
2 segments
Speaker 59
1 segment
Senator Jane English Unverified
2 segments
Speaker 56
1 segment
Speaker 64
1 segment
Representative Chad Puryear Unverified
1 segment
Speaker 50
1 segment
Speaker 68
1 segment
Speaker 69
1 segment