ALC-Executive Subcommittee

Call a meeting I'm a recognized Miss Marty Garrity to talk about be on the agenda thank you Mr chairman Gary with the of Legislative Research the first item is consideration of an amendment to the consulting agreement between the bureau and the Siegel group of due to the timing and the continued work on the legislation and different provisions of the Segal's report there is a need to extend the contract with them the agreement is in your packet it's for one month and under the previous contract the chairs could authorize an increase in the contract amount for up to ten percent so we just out talk to Segal and that's the amount that they would be able the additional amount that they would be able to charge for the bureau for that one month extension and that amount is a little over fifty seven thousand dollars. So committee I'll give you some backstory on that we've been meeting with the B. D. E. and there's some Contracts in order fees and have to be written Eddie EDT in a timely manner we didn't want them to write any R. F. peas are pursue any new contracts that we may run a rail of legislation are recommendations from the legislature in the fiscal session time frame so we've been working with Jake and we thought if we could hire these guys for one more month and let them work straight with the B. D. E. they can start getting those are fees ready and they will be in line with the same recommendations that we have adopted and I'll be happy to take any questions from membership. And and Jake is present for any questions to the meeting. See non I have a motion. Second follows a favor say aye. All opposed us have it so with that we'll go to see and Senator Hickey recognize you on recommendations on this contract. Thank you Mr chair of discussions we've been having on this is that most of you all know that we've been kind of a Delaying this for the last couple months we said we would to. Make a decision you know as of today I believe that at this time we think we have decided that this may not be the best way for the for the state to to go I've been in contact with the Speaker and also representative Jett to at the legislation we're gonna be looking at this and I think that the intent the original intent was probably just that we would get this dynamic scoring and things of that nature nature on certain type of a super projects possible you know tax cuts and things to that in this we decided maybe a little bit more broad in a little bit more. Expensive then we want to then we want to you know to spend on this so we're just to at this point we're going to pull this down if that's okay Mister chair. And there could possibly be some special language if it's needed in the in the fiscal just as it would relate to some type of super project when we have thank you. Thank you any questions. See non and that concludes our business we stand adjourned.