Said in CommitteeBeta

Exactly as spoken.

ALC-Review

July 18, 2019 ·11:00 AM ·Room A, MAC ·31:34
Video Transcript 7 documents

Transcript

Transcript available Whisper ✓ SliQ live captions: not yet available Download .txt
Machine transcript

May contain errors. Verify important quotations against the official video.

About transcript accuracy
Source
Whisper
Model
ggml-large-v3-turbo.bin RTX5060
Processing date
October 8, 2026
Unknown speaker 0:00
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Scott Flippo Unverified 7:30
This meeting started, and as a reminder just to you all that, you know, we don't have ALC this month, so all actions that we take today are going to be final. And with that, we're going to start off with a supplemental agenda, but need somebody to make a motion to suspend the rules.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 3 8:01
So anybody, Senator Hendren, you have a motion. All right.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 4 8:12
All in favor? Opposed? All right. Thank you, Mr.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 7 8:18
Chairman. So you have a packet that says supplemental agenda on it. We have two items in the supplemental agenda. The first one is a method of finance, and you'll have a letter on the first page from University of Arkansas, Rich Mountain. They simply state that they missed a deadline for submitting to be included in the tentative agenda that's posted a week out. They've broken ground on a building project, and this is for new housing for the campus, and it was a mistake in missing the deadline. but if they wait any longer, it jeopardizes their ability to complete the project on time and under budget. Then on the next page, you'll see the actual method of finance. It is for their student housing and food service, $7.5 million, and they note that they have bond proceeds to pay for this project. Then the second item on this agenda is a letter from National Park Community College or National Park College, and they are wanting to obtain an entity to work on getting bonds issued for them for a project that they have also for new student housing. And they note that they missed the time frame, but they have a grand opening date scheduled and trying to get this project completed by August of 2020 and concerned that if they are delayed, they'll run into some problems with their scheduling. and on the last page of the supplemental agenda you'll see the professional consultant services contract for crews and associates for bond underwriting services for the issuance of the building that they're wanting to build for student housing
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 9 9:59
$69,750 those are the two items on the supplemental agenda all right members
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Scott Flippo Unverified 10:06
any questions any objections seeing none this will stand as
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 7 10:11
reviewed. Mr. Chairman, the next item and the first item on the regular agenda are the methods of finance. On page three of your agenda packet is the letter from DFA accounting with the methods of finance that they've sent over for today's meeting. On page four, you'll see the first ones. National Park College is the first one for their student housing project. It is a revised method of finance to $9,100,277. Again, they note that this will be done through bond proceeds. Number two is Ozarka College for the Melbourne Welding Lab renovation to create a new welding lab at that facility. $320,000. They have plant fund reserves to fund it. Then we have a few for Southern Arkansas University. The first one for HVAC improvements, $780,000. They note that they have reserves as well as bond proceeds to pay for it they have an agri shop number four for five hundred and seventy five thousand dollars they have foundation funds reserves and lab fees to cover those costs baseball developments facility two hundred ninety five thousand dollars they have foundation funds to cover that project and an auxiliary sports facility eight hundred and eighty thousand dollars they have foundation funds student fees reserves as well as bond proceeds a combination of those for that project number seven at the bottom of the page is southern arkansas university tech for an administration building facelift eight hundred ninety six thousand six hundred ninety dollars they note that they've received a grant from the arkansas natural and cultural resources i also want to point out that we'll see a contract on page 11 that has to do with this project as well and then on page five you have uams for our third floor Renovation Student Success Center, $641,286, and they note that they'll have clinical reserves and revenues for that project. Those are today's methods of finance. All right, members. Does anybody have
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Scott Flippo Unverified 12:09
any questions on those? Any objections? See none. Those items will stand as reviewed.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 7 12:16
Mr. Chairman, the next item on the agenda will be our discretionary grants. The first group comes to us from the Department of Health. on page six you have the first one and this is state funding for local level charitable clinics number two and number three are both through their office of oral health and these have to do with school-based sealant projects for preventative oral health services those two are federally funded on page seven you have federally funded for diabetes self-management education and support Number five is a state-funded grant to the Arkansas Cancer Coalition for educational and screening opportunities. Number six, also for the Cancer Coalition, but this one is federally funded, an amendment for providing support and technical assistance to reduce cancer burden through implementing the Arkansas Cancer Plan. And on page 8, you have state funding for prostate cancer for education and patient assistance. Then on page 9, you have one grant from the Department of Human Services with the Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care. This is an amendment to the grant that they have, adding $511 for evaluation and data support for the Arkansas State-targeted response to the opioid crisis program. those are the grants on today's agenda all right members are
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Scott Flippo Unverified 13:42
there any questions any objections see none these items will stand as reviewed mr.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 6 13:49
chairman on page 10 we begin our contracts
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 7 13:52
both professional consultant and technical and general services contracts on page 10 is the letter from dfa office of state procurement noting that no facially apparent illegality or irregularity is found in the contracts that they've submitted for today's review. On page 11 we have we begin our construction related contracts. The first one is the SAU Tech contract that I mentioned that we saw the MOF for. This is for architectural services for their administration building. Again they've received a natural and cultural resources grant to fund this. Number two is UA Fort Smith and this is to remove the non-historic 1995 addition to a building that they have on their campus they also have received a grant from natural cultural resources council for this project then number three is uca for final construction cost and close out on their nursing science and disorder building those are the construction related contracts on today's agenda all right
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Scott Flippo Unverified 14:55
members any questions objections seeing none these items will stand as reviewed
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 7 14:59
The next group of contracts are intergovernmental contracts. The first one on page 13 is the education department with UAMS. This is for evaluation, data collection, management, analysis, and reporting of federal notice of funding opportunities. Number two is DHS with ASU Jonesboro for training, coaching, and technical assistance for the early Head Start child care partnership. And number three is National Park Community College with the Garland County Sheriff to provide security on their campus. Those are the intergovernmental contracts. All
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Scott Flippo Unverified 15:35
right, members. Any questions, objections? Seeing none, these items will stand as reviewed. The next group of
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 7 15:42
contracts that we look at are out-of-state contracts. The first one on page 14 is with Arkansas Heritage for controlled burns. I do want to point out that there will be three additional contracts in the in-state grouping for this same thing for Heritage. Number two is DFA Management Services. This is for the maintenance and support of the Arkansas Integrated Revenue System. Number three is the Health Department. This is an amendment for their hardware for record storage. Number four is DHS Division of Medical Services with General Dynamics. This is for evaluating the Arkansas Works Program. Number five, Northwest Arkansas Community College. This is a little over $2.2 million for cloud-based software program. Number six, UA Fayetteville. This is for cohesive strategic business plan to grow and expand the Arkansas research and technology part. On page 16, UALR has an amendment to the contract for their bioanalytical services. Number eight, UAMS. this is a contract for providing legal services for them and then uca has a contract for customer relationship management system for their admissions program those are the out-of-state contracts on today's agenda all right and i do have a question here
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 18 16:59
so if we got if we got somebody from dhs here
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Scott Flippo Unverified 17:04
members i'm looking on page 15 item number four
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 19 17:07
sarah we all know who you are but if you'll go ahead and for the record give
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 21 17:19
us your name and who you're with sarah collins lion i'm chief procurement officer
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 22 17:23
at dhs sarah i just heard a horrible rumor before you get started is today your last day at dhs this
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 23 17:29
is my last review committee for being from dhs but i'm there until the second what did you do to deserve that well
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Scott Flippo Unverified 17:38
we're going to need to miss you here at review now continue so uh we explain just to the committee you know what this review is what we're reviewing with arkansas work specifically how it came into being i heard earlier there was another vendor that originally had this contract y'all
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 23 17:58
suspected that they might have underbid um so i'll give you a little bit of history this is the expanded medicaid portion so this is not the work requirement portion. The evaluation plan is submitted when the agency submitted its waiver. So the design of the evaluation has been approved by CMS. Previously, this was done through an intergovernmental contract with ACI. This time, we thought it would be best to have a little price competition and see if we could get a better rate. So we sent out an IFB. We had five vendors responded. The entity that responded as the lowest bidder was significantly lower than the others. And so we wanted to clarify that they understood the parameters of the IFB. And when we sought clarification, they responded back that, in fact, they did not understand all of the requirements and what they had submitted did not comport with the parameters of the IFB so they were they were disqualified and we went to the next lowest bidder
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 29 19:08
and when were they disqualified Sarah how
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 23 19:12
long ago was that um let's see it I believe it was in
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Chair Unverified 19:17
April okay okay all right I see uh representative view banks you're recognized for a question sir
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Jon S. Eubanks Unverified 19:26
thank you mr. chair what are we going to do with the results of this information this study I'd see in the explanation that it's a comparison between Arkansas works population and the traditional Medicaid population is there possible that based on the information that you get that it may be a decision that these individuals would be best served under traditional Medicaid or a traditional expanded Medicaid rather than Arkansas works or what exactly we're going to find out from this. Let me bring someone from DMS up
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 21 20:02
here that may be from the program that may be able to speak to how the program intends to use the results of the evaluation
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 38 20:20
good morning Catherine Silva deputy director CM or DMS and these evaluations
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 39 20:27
are required as part of an 1115 demonstration project one component of those demonstrations is that we have to demonstrate budget neutrality so you have to prove that your demonstration is no more expensive than it would be to operate under the traditional model and so this evaluation is required excuse me by CMS and has been it's just that we're transitioning vendors follow-up mr. chair you're recognized for
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Jon S. Eubanks Unverified 20:52
follow-up is it possible we could find out that there might be a cheaper way of doing providing these services rather than through Arkansas works but rather maybe possibly to just expand it Medicaid I
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 39 21:08
think that's always a possibility and we get regular evaluation reports that look at a variety of factors including access and health outcomes as well as cost considerations and so that's all part of the evaluation design okay if
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Jon S. Eubanks Unverified 21:23
you were to find that out would you recommend that we change what we're doing?
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 39 21:30
I think we have two years left on the current waiver, if I'm recalling correctly. And I think in looking towards that renewal or extension period, we would certainly be looking at any opportunities to maximize efficiencies and improve outcomes in that program. So the evaluation design is pretty detailed at looking at different populations, even within the expansion population. and so we are certainly interested in looking at those results and seeing how we could improve our program design. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 23 22:02
All right, members, are there any other questions? And I just wanted to clarify, I noticed on the bid sheet the disqualification occurred in
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Scott Flippo Unverified 22:11
the second week of May. Okay, okay. Thanks, Sarah. All right, seeing no further questions and without objections, these items will stand
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 6 22:21
as reviewed. Thank you all. Mr. Chairman, the next group of contracts are in-state contracts, beginning on page 17. As I mentioned, the first three
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 7 22:28
are Arkansas Heritage for the controlled burns that they take care of. Then on page 18, DFA Child Support Enforcement. This is a contract amendment for a process service company to serve legal papers in custodial and non-custodial parent child support cases. Health Department has one there for Cranford and Johnson, $2 million. This is for development and implementation of a comprehensive statewide media campaign to promote their health communications, tobacco prevention, and cessation. Number six is DHS for Qualified Residential Treatment Program. Number seven, Public Service Commission. This one is for Consulting Services. this is a company that assists the commission in addressing various public utility issues and then we have ua phillips community college for lawn care services those are the in-state contracts on today's agenda all
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Scott Flippo Unverified 23:24
right members are there any questions objections seeing none these items will stand as reviewed mr chairman
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 7 23:31
the next group of items on the agenda are renovate renovations of historic sites and this is kind of new and not something the committee sees often, but Arkansas Code 22.9208 allows agencies charged with restoring and maintaining historic properties, authority to select contractors on basis of lowest responsible bid price, bidders' experience in like work and techniques they employ, and authority to reimburse contractors on actual costs for those costs which cannot be accurately predetermined before undertaking the project. So we do have two projects that have been procured using that method. They are both for Department of Parks and Tourism. The first one on page 20 is the project for the Methodist Church renovation phase two at Historic State Park Powhatan. $434,712 with Witzel Evans Rasko Architects. That is the first one. And the second one on page 21 also, as I said, with Department of Parks and Tourism for the exterior improvements to the to a log cabin at Arkansas Post Museum $88,582.50 with Taylor Kempis Architects and again those are done through the renovation of historic sites and that's the last two items on the regular agenda. All right
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Scott Flippo Unverified 24:56
members any questions? Seeing none these items will stand as reviewed. Mr.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 7 25:02
Chairman we also have reports on today's agenda. The first report begins on page 22. This is the Medicaid non-emergency transportation report for May. Then the next report that we have is a report beginning on page 28 of professional consultant services contracts that have been executed that are below the threshold of $50,000. On page 33, you have the technical and general services contracts under the level of for executed contracts that are just reported to this committee. And then finally on page, on the last page of your agenda, page 38, you have an emergency purchases report. This is for ADEQ. Back in June, they contracted with NAPHOLTS to install a temporary flood barrier at their ADEQ headquarters for $45,850. And that concludes all the items on today's agenda. Senator Rice, you recognize for a question?
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Chair Unverified 26:04
Just a question I'm guessing
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Terry Rice Unverified 26:07
for AFMC on the net report. Okay, do we have a...
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Chair Unverified 26:14
And what page in contract was that? It starts on 23. 23. We have somebody
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 30 26:21
from come up here. DHS, is that Catherine coming back up?
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 54 26:34
All right, Senator Rice Field, Director, after
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 38 26:40
Catherine introduces herself. Catherine Silva, Deputy
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Chair Unverified 26:42
Director, DMS. All right, Senator, you recognize the procedure of
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Terry Rice Unverified 26:47
your question. Thank you. Just for clarification, can you tell me how this data is compiled is this data from afmc or is it self-reported from the brokers can you give us some background on that
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 39 27:04
sure this data is collected for us monthly by afmc as our monitoring contractor for the non-emergency transportation program if we kind of look through it briefly on page three the complaints are those that come from beneficiaries who call our helpline which is managed through AFMC and they give a reason for a complaint and then AFMC also does vehicle inspections and so the vehicle inspection data is based on that and then the attendant report all of the brokers send data on background checks and other attendant and driver information to afmc so it does all come to us through them but some of it comes from the brokers as they hire drivers or additional subcontractors and get those people
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Terry Rice Unverified 27:54
on board okay and in the information supplied by the brokers is that spot checked or what what's the oversight
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 39 28:03
on that yes sir i think if i'm recalling correctly the monitoring contract has where afmc goes out for different inspections at certain intervals throughout the year and would check on certain paperwork and then also in looking at the vehicles and meeting the drivers validating their higher dates but they actually get
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 38 28:23
copies of a lot of the paperwork validating background checks and that sort of
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Chair Unverified 28:31
thing okay thank you thank mr chair thank
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Missy Irvin Unverified 28:35
you senator irvin you are recognized for a question thank you i in reviewing the information that they've compiled region a and b are particularly my regions where we've had a lot of um i mean as you can see no drivers available and i'm getting calls still about that so is this contract with Southeastern Trans, is it able to, I mean, are you able to contract each region or, I mean, if they're not performing in Region A and Region B, but they are performing in C, D, E, and F, are you able to split that contract or is it, and find a different provider or how does that work? I'm just, you know, folks are not able to make their appointments and I'm just getting calls and the data shows there's a lot of complaints in those two regions where people aren't getting the drivers aren't there or available. Right and Senator historically
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 39 29:32
prior to Southeast Trans in the past several years of the program region A has been the most difficult to hire drivers and staff the routes and that's where we have seen the highest frequency of complaints. We have been seeing a decline every single month in the number of complaints since they took over the contracts in those regions from MTM in February, but we have not been fully satisfied with the progress and put them on a corrective action plan, and they have committed to 100% network adequacy in all of those regions by August 1st, and so we're
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 38 30:05
getting weekly progress reports on that now. Perfect. Okay, thank you. That's what I needed
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Jack Fortner Unverified 30:14
to know. All right. Representative Fortner, do you have a question? I do. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Again, in Region A, those reports that you're receiving about how it's getting better, could you send me those? Because the people that are calling me don't
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Speaker 39 30:29
think it's getting any better. Absolutely, Representative. And I'd be happy to discuss with you or any constituents
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Representative Jack Fortner Unverified 30:35
any outstanding issues. We'll talk later, and I'll get your
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Senator Scott Flippo Unverified 30:39
number. Thank you. Thank you. All right, members. Not seeing any further questions or any objections, these items will stand as reviewed. And that concludes this month's review meeting.
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error
Unknown speaker 31:17
You
▶ Play Suggest a correction Report an error

Agenda

A. Call to Order - Comments from Chairs

8:17

B. Methods of Finance

8:36

C. Discretionary Grants

12:21

D. Services Contracts for Legislative Review

14:14

E. Renovation of Historic Sites

23:35

F. Reports and Communications

25:35

G. Other Business

30:51

H. Adjournment

30:52

Speakers

Senator Scott Flippo Unverified
15 segments
Speaker 3
1 segment
Speaker 4
1 segment
Speaker 7
28 segments
Speaker 9
1 segment
Speaker 6
2 segments
Speaker 18
1 segment
Speaker 19
1 segment
Speaker 21
2 segments
Speaker 22
1 segment
Speaker 23
6 segments
Speaker 29
1 segment
Chair Unverified
5 segments
Representative Jon S. Eubanks Unverified
5 segments
Speaker 38
4 segments
Speaker 39
11 segments
Senator Terry Rice Unverified
3 segments
Speaker 30
1 segment
Speaker 54
1 segment
Senator Missy Irvin Unverified
4 segments
Representative Jack Fortner Unverified
3 segments