Representative Eas
Speaker names can be wrong. Names are identified automatically through voice matching and may contain errors. Always verify speaker attribution against the video before citing it.
Committees
- ALC - Administrative Rules
Recent Meetings
| Date | Committee | Speaking Time |
|---|---|---|
| June 18, 2026 | ALC - Administrative Rules | 140s |
Recent Transcript Excerpts
lined that all up with CMS before. In the case I just described of us fixing the bill in session with an emergency clause, you passing or creating an emergency rule, would you have to go to CMS? I don't know that's sitting right here. I
And I guess through CMS is really the question. As
There may be an argument to be made that not entirely. But I think if we go down the road of rejecting that, you're at another, what, three, four months before we can get back here with another rule. Alternatively, we can go into session. In 2027, Senator Irvin has indicated she would be, I think, I don't want to put words in her mouth, interested in fixing the language of the bill. It could have an emergency clause. You could pass an emergency rule that would last 120 days. Would that give you enough time in that 120-day period to get the permanent rule to us?
to reject a rule that doesn't comply with legislative intent. I think mostly this one does comply with legislative intent.
recognized for a question. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Can you back up? I know it's been six months or longer when this issue came up originally and we couldn't increase reimbursement rates based on a specific diagnosis. Can you go back and remind me what that was all about?
we lined that all up with Cms before in in the case I just described of us changing fixing the bill in session you with an emergency clause you passing or creating an emergency rule would you have to go to Cms? I don't know
time in that 120 day period to get the permanent rule to us and and I guess through CmS is really the question
mostly this one does comply with legislative intent there may be an argument to be made that not entirely but I think if we go down the road of rejecting that you're at another what34 months before we can get back here with another rule alternatively we can go into session 2027 senator Irvin has indicated she would be I think I don't want to put words in her mouth interested in fixing the language of the bill it could have an emergency clause you could pass an emergency rule that would last 120 days would that give you enough
reject a rule that doesn't comply with legislative intent I think
Representative Eas you're recognized for a question Thank you Mr Chairman can you back up I know it's been six months or longer when this issue came up originally and that and we couldn't re increase reimbursement rates based on a specific diagnosis can you can you go back and remind me what what that was all about.
Bills Discussed
No bills found.