Representative Billy Gaskill
Speaker names can be wrong. Names are identified automatically through voice matching and may contain errors. Always verify speaker attribution against the video before citing it.
Committees
- Boys State
Recent Meetings
| Date | Committee | Speaking Time |
|---|---|---|
| June 4, 2010 | Boys State | 218s |
Recent Transcript Excerpts
So you first begin with your permit at 14, where you have to have a parent in the car. Then by 16, you can drive by yourself but with only one passenger. And then by 18, you can have more than one passenger in your vehicle. If you were to pass this bill, it would get rid of that process that we had already implemented, and therefore, it would make responsibility given to a younger-aged driver, which I think is a bad idea.
Representative Gaskill, you recognize. Arkansas has implemented a plan for a gradual change
in license to give teens responsibility.
what's your point too long it's just simple questioning and they do not be need to leave more time
about reconsidering this because we did not we just went through it really quickly and I don't think all of us had a fair sure to think about what this is actually doing and what bill we just enacted, and I think we need
I think you all just need to think that
and we did not have a roll call after that and i do not think we had fair enough debate on that motion and we need more time
Why should we help murderers and rapists get a job when there are good people, your neighbors and friends, that have no job and can't find one? We should use the money to better our neighbors and not the felons. Representative Dickinson, for what purpose? Movement, motion. What's the motion? I'd like to move to postpone temporarily. Proper motion and active aidable.
money to send a convicted person after they have gone through prison to get a job when there are plenty of good people out there that don't have a job.
go to people that were convicted of violent crimes?
be referred and so I think it should be referred back to the committee due to the fact that we've all been confused about the details of exactly what volunteering is, what tax and tax deductions that we have. And I think we need to go back to
details on this bill. is the proper motion is to
or even have in both your arms. I mean, computers, they don't care if you have one arm or you have two. You can still get many jobs working on Internet, calling. And besides that, if a veteran is missing a limb, they're probably not going to try to get jobs that are hard labor. They're probably
jobs that don't require you having full functions of your legs
to say to that question. I'm going to step down from questions now. to
be a good system, just letting them only buy food. That way there's no chance of them spending money on drugs. Probably a really good idea. All
activity, so illegal activity is obviously a wrong. Follow up? Go ahead. So that means we should allow
If we're providing our hard-earned money and taxpayer dollars, I don't think it should go to drugs. No offense, if they test positive for drugs, I say cut them off, because we are good citizens, and we're giving money to bad citizens that are on drugs. We don't need to do that. Now it's open for
Bills Discussed
No bills found.